首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research Procedia >Comparing Lane Based and Lane-group Based Models of Signalised Intersection Networks
【24h】

Comparing Lane Based and Lane-group Based Models of Signalised Intersection Networks

机译:信号交叉口网络的基于车道和基于车道组的模型比较

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper compares two analytical approaches for modelling signalised intersection networks in relation to the assessment of signal coordination quality as a fundamental element of network performance analysis. These are (i) the traditional model based on using “lane groups” or “links” through aggregation of individual lane conditions, and (ii) a new “lane-based” model of upstream departure and downstream arrival patterns as well as midblock lane changes between upstream and downstream intersections, and the resulting proportions of traffic arriving during the green period at an individual lane level. The latter is part of a lane-based network model that involves blockage of upstream intersection lanes by downstream queues (queue spillback) and capacity constraint applied to oversaturated upstream intersections. The differences between the two models are expected to be particularly important in evaluating closely-spaced intersections with high demand flows where vehicles have limited opportunities for lane changes between intersections. The lane-based model can make use of “special movement classes” (e.g. through movements at external approaches which become turning movements at downstream internal approaches, and the dogleg movements at staggered T intersections) to enhance the modelling of signal platoon patterns. This allows assignment of specific movements to separate lanes and separate signal phases, and tracking of their second-by-second platoon patterns through the network separately. The method also allows better estimation of unequal lane use cases at closely-spaced (paired) intersection systems, a factor which also affects signal platoon patterns. The paper presents a staggered T network example to demonstrate important aspects of modelling signal platoon patterns by approach lane use and movement class, and to compare the resulting traffic performance measures (delay, back of queue, level of service) with those estimated using the traditional method based on lane groups or links.
机译:本文就信号协调质量的评估作为网络性能分析的基本要素,比较了两种建模信号交叉路网的分析方法。这些是(i)基于通过汇总各个车道条件使用“车道组”或“链接”的传统模型,以及(ii)上游出发和下游到达模式以及中段车道的新“基于车道”模型上游和下游交叉路口之间的变化,以及在绿化期间到达各个车道级别的交通比例。后者是基于车道的网络模型的一部分,该模型涉及下游路口对上游路口车道的阻塞(队列溢出)和应用于过饱和上游路口的通行能力限制。两种模型之间的差异在评估高需求流量的近距离交叉路口时特别重要,因为在交叉路口之间车辆换乘机会有限的情况下,高需求流量。基于车道的模型可以利用“特殊运动类别”(例如,通过外部进近处的运动,在下游内部进近处变为转弯运动,以及在交错的T型交叉口处出现狗腿运动)来增强信号排模式的建模。这允许将特定的运动分配给单独的车道和单独的信号相位,并通过网络分别跟踪其第二到第二排模式。该方法还可以更好地估计在近距离(成对)交叉路口系统中不等车道的使用情况,这也是一个影响信号排模式的因素。本文提供了一个交错的T网络示例,以演示通过进近车道使用和移动等级对信号排模式进行建模的重要方面,并将由此产生的交通绩效指标(延迟,排队,服务水平)与使用传统方法估算的指标进行比较基于车道组或链接的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号