首页> 外文期刊>Vascular Health and Risk Management >Effect of transition from sitaxsentan to ambrisentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension
【24h】

Effect of transition from sitaxsentan to ambrisentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension

机译:从西他生坦过渡到安布森坦对肺动脉高压的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction : Currently available endothelin receptor antagonists for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension block either the endothelin (ET) receptor A or both A and B receptors. Transition from one endothelin receptor antagonist to another may theoretically alter side-effects or efficacy. We report our experience of a transition from sitaxsentan to ambrisentan, both predominant ETA receptor antagonists, in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients. Methods: At Baylor Pulmonary Hypertension Center, 18 patients enrolled in the open-label extension phase of the original sitaxsentan studies (Sitaxsentan To Relieve ImpaireD Exercise) were transitioned to ambrisentan (from July 2007 to September 2007) at the time of study closure. Pre-transition (PreT), 1 month (1Mth) and 1 year (1Yr) post-transition assessments of 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), brain naturetic peptide (BNP) levels, WHO functional class (WHO FC), Borg dyspnea score (BDS), oxygen saturation, liver function, and peripheral edema were compared. Results: 6MWD was 356 ± 126 m at PreT, 361 ± 125 m at 1Mth, and 394 ± 114 m at 1Yr (mean ± SD). There was no difference in the walk distance at 1Mth and 1Yr post transition compared with PreT ( P = 0.92, 0.41 respectively). Oxygen saturation was no different at 1Mth and 1Yr to PreT level ( P = 0.49 and P = 0.06 respectively). BNP was 178 ± 244 pg/mL at PreT, 129 ± 144 pg/mL at 1Mth and 157 ± 201 at 1Yr. Peripheral edema was present in 7/18 patients at PreT, in 8/16 patients at 1Mth, and in 6/13 patients at 1Yr post transition. Proportions of patients with edema over these 3 time points did not change significantly ( P = 0.803). At 1Yr, 2 patients had died, 1 had undergone lung transplantation, 1 had relocated, and 1 patient was started on intravenous prostacyclin therapy. Over 3 points (baseline, 1 month, and 1 year), there was no significant change in function class ( P = 0.672). Conclusion: Our limited data suggest that ETA receptor antagonists can be switched from one to another with sustained exercise capacity and maintained WHO FC with no increase in incidence of peripheral edema.
机译:简介:目前可用于治疗肺动脉高压的内皮素受体拮抗剂可阻断内皮素(ET)受体A或A和B受体。从一种内皮素受体拮抗剂过渡到另一种在理论上可以改变副作用或功效。我们报告了我们在肺动脉高压患者中从西他生坦向安贝生坦过渡的经验,这两种都是主要的ET A 受体拮抗剂。方法:在Baylor肺动脉高压中心,在最初西他森坦研究的开放标签扩展阶段(西他森坦至缓解ImpaireD锻炼)的开放标签扩展期入组的18例患者在研究结束时被转换为安布雷森坦(从2007年7月至2007年9月)。过渡前(PreT),过渡后1个月(1Mth)和1年(1Yr)对6分钟步行距离(6MWD),脑自然肽(BNP)水平,WHO功能分类(WHO FC),博格呼吸困难的评估比较BDS评分,血氧饱和度,肝功能和周围水肿。结果:6MWD在PreT时为356±126 m,在1Mth时为361±125 m,在1Yr时为394±114 m(均值±SD)。与PreT相比,过渡后1Mth和1Yr的步行距离没有差异(分别为P = 0.92、0.41)。氧饱和度在PreT水平的1Mth和1Yr处没有变化(分别为P = 0.49和P = 0.06)。 PreT的BNP为178±244 pg / mL,1Mth的BNP为129±144 pg / mL,1Yr的BNP为157±201。 PreT时有7/18例患者出现外周水肿,第1Mth时有8/16例患者,过渡后1年时有6/13例患者。在这三个时间点,水肿患者的比例没有明显变化(P = 0.803)。在1年时,有2例患者死亡,1例接受了肺移植,1例已转移,1例患者开始接受静脉前列环素治疗。超过3分(基线,1个月和1年),功能类别无明显变化(P = 0.672)。结论:我们有限的数据表明,ET A 受体拮抗剂可以在维持运动能力和维持WHO FC的同时从一种切换为另一种,而不会增加周围水肿的发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号