首页> 外文期刊>Trials >How informed is declared altruism in clinical trials? A qualitative interview study of patient decision-making about the QUEST trials (Quality of Life after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction)
【24h】

How informed is declared altruism in clinical trials? A qualitative interview study of patient decision-making about the QUEST trials (Quality of Life after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction)

机译:在临床试验中如何宣布利他主义?对患者有关QUEST试验决策的定性访谈研究(乳房切除和乳房重建术后的生活质量)

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) often fail to recruit sufficient participants, despite altruism being cited as their motivation. Previous investigations of factors influencing participation decisions have been methodologically limited. This study evaluated how women weigh up different motivations after initially expressing altruism, and explored their understanding of a trial and its alternatives. The trial was the ‘Quality of Life after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction’ (QUEST) trial. Methods Thirty-nine women participated in qualitative interviews 1?month post-surgery. Twenty-seven women (10 trial decliners and 17 acceptors) who spontaneously mentioned ‘altruism’ were selected for thematic analysis. Verbatim transcripts were coded independently by two researchers. Participants’ motivations to accept or decline randomisation were cross-referenced with their understanding of the QUEST trials and the process of randomisation. Results The seven emerging themes were: (1) altruism expressed by acceptors and decliners; (2) overriding personal needs in decliners; (3) pure altruism in acceptors; (4) ‘hypothetical altruism’ amongst acceptors; (5) weak altruism amongst acceptors; (6) conditional altruism amongst acceptors; and (7) sense of duty to participate. Poor understanding of the trial rationale and its implications was also evident. Conclusions Altruism was a motivating factor for participation in the QUEST randomised controlled trials where the main outcomes comprised quality of life and allocated treatments comprised established surgical procedures. Women’s decisions were influenced by their understanding of the trial. Both acceptors and decliners of the trial expressed ‘altruism’, but most acceptors lacked an obvious treatment preference, hoped for personal benefits regarding a treatment allocation, or did not articulate complete understanding of the trial. Trial registration QUEST A, ISRCTN38846532 ; Date assigned 6 January 2010. QUEST B, ISRCTN92581226 ; Date assigned 6 January 2010.
机译:背景技术尽管利他主义被认为是他们的动机,但随机对照试验(RCT)常常无法招募足够的参与者。以前对影响参与决策的因素进行的调查在方法上受到限制。这项研究评估了女性在最初表达利他主义后如何权衡不同的动机,并探索了她们对试验及其替代方法的理解。该试验是“乳房切除术和乳房重建术后的生活质量”(QUEST)试验。方法39名妇女在术后1个月参加了定性访谈。选择了自发提到“利他主义”的27位女性(10位拒绝接受者和17位接受者)进行主题分析。逐字记录由两名研究人员独立编码。参与者对QUEST试验和随机化过程的理解相互交叉引用了接受或拒绝随机化的动机。结果出现了七个主题:(1)接受者和拒绝者表达的利他主义; (2)忽略拒绝者的个人需求; (3)接受者的纯利他主义; (4)接受者中的“假设利他主义”; (5)接受者中的弱利他主义; (6)接受者中的条件利他主义; (7)参与的责任感。对审判依据及其含义的理解不充分也很明显。结论利他主义是参与QUEST随机对照试验的动机,该试验的主要结果包括生活质量,分配的治疗包括既定的手术程序。妇女的决定受到她们对审判的理解的影响。试验的接受者和拒绝者都表示“利他主义”,但是大多数接受者缺乏明显的治疗偏爱,希望从治疗分配中获得个人利益,或者没有表达出对试验的完全理解。试用注册QUEST A,ISRCTN38846532;日期指定为2010年1月6日。QUEST B,ISRCTN92581226;分配日期为2010年1月6日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号