首页> 外文期刊>Trials >The impact of advertising patient and public involvement on trial recruitment: embedded cluster randomised recruitment trial
【24h】

The impact of advertising patient and public involvement on trial recruitment: embedded cluster randomised recruitment trial

机译:广告患者和公众参与对试验招募的影响:嵌入式集群随机招募试验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Patient and public involvement in research (PPIR) may improve trial recruitment rates, but it is unclear how. Where trials use PPIR to improve design and conduct, many do not communicate this clearly to potential participants. Better communication of PPIR might encourage patient enrolment, as trials may be perceived as more socially valid, relevant and trustworthy. We aimed to evaluate the impact on recruitment of directly advertising PPIR to potential trial participants. Methods This is a cluster trial, embedded within a host trial (‘EQUIP’) recruiting service users diagnosed with severe mental illness. The intervention was informed by a systematic review, a qualitative study, social comparison theory and a stakeholder workshop including service users and carers. Adopting Participatory Design approaches, we co-designed the recruitment intervention with PPIR partners using a leaflet to advertise the PPIR in EQUIP and sent potential participants invitations with the leaflet (intervention group) or not (control group). Primary outcome was the proportion of patients enrolled in EQUIP. Secondary outcomes included the proportions of patients who positively responded to the trial invitation. Results Thirty-four community mental health teams were randomised and 8182 service users invited. For the primary outcome, 4% of patients in the PPIR group were enrolled versus 5.3% of the control group. The intervention was not effective for improving recruitment rates (adjusted OR?=?0.75, 95% CI?=?0.53 to 1.07, p =?0.113). For the secondary outcome of positive response, the intervention was not effective, with 7.3% of potential participants in the intervention group responding positively versus 7.9% of the control group (adjusted OR?=?0.74, 95% CI?=?0.53 to 1.04, p =?0.082). We did not find a positive impact of directly advertising PPIR on any other outcomes. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the largest ever embedded trial to evaluate a recruitment or PPIR intervention. Advertising PPIR did not improve enrolment rates or any other outcome. It is possible that rather than advertising PPIR being the means to improve recruitment, PPIR may have an alternative impact on trials by making them more attractive, acceptable and patient-centred. We discuss potential reasons for our findings and implications for recruitment practice and research. Trial registration numbers ISRCTN, ISRCTN16488358 . Registered on 14 May 2014. Study Within A Trial, SWAT-26 . Registered on 21 January 2016.
机译:背景患者和公众参与研究(PPIR)可能会提高试验的招募率,但目前尚不清楚。在试验中使用PPIR改善设计和行为的情况下,许多人并未将其明确传达给潜在参与者。 PPIR的更好沟通可能会鼓励患者入组,因为试验可能被认为更具社会有效性,相关性和可信赖性。我们旨在评估直接广告PPIR向潜在试验参与者招募的影响。方法这是一项集群试验,嵌入在主机试验(EQUIP)中,该试验招募被诊断患有严重精神疾病的服务用户。通过系统的回顾,定性研究,社会比较理论以及包括服务使用者和护理人员在内的利益相关方研讨会,为干预提供了信息。通过采用参与式设计方法,我们使用传单在EQUIP中宣传PPIR,与PPIR合作伙伴共同设计了招聘干预措施,并与传单(干预组)或不与传单(对照组)发送了潜在的参与者邀请。主要结局是纳入EQUIP的患者比例。次要结果包括积极响应试验邀请的患者比例。结果随机分配了34个社区精神卫生小组,并邀请了8182名服务使用者。对于主要结局,PPIR组的患者为4%,而对照组为5.3%。干预措施对提高招聘率无效(调整后的OR = 0.75,95%CI = 0.53至1.07,p = 0.113)。对于阳性反应的次要结果,干预无效,干预组中7.3%的潜在参与者阳性,而对照组为7.9%(调整后的OR = 0.74,95%CI = 0.53至1.04)。 ,p = 0.082)。我们没有发现直接宣传PPIR会对其他任何结果产生积极影响。结论据我们所知,这是有史以来最大的评估招募或PPIR干预的嵌入式试验。广告PPIR并未提高入学率或其他任何结果。 PPIR可能不是通过宣传PPIR来改善招聘,而是通过使试验更具吸引力,更容易接受和以患者为中心而对试验产生替代性影响。我们讨论了发现结果的潜在原因以及对招聘实践和研究的影响。试用注册号ISRCTN,ISRCTN16488358。 2014年5月14日注册。在试验中学习,SWAT-26。 2016年1月21日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号