...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Will Mobile Diabetes Education Teams (MDETs) in primary care improve patient care processes and health outcomes? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Will Mobile Diabetes Education Teams (MDETs) in primary care improve patient care processes and health outcomes? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:初级保健中的流动糖尿病教育团队(MDET)会改善患者的护理过程和健康结果吗?随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background There is evidence to suggest that delivery of diabetes self-management support by diabetes educators in primary care may improve patient care processes and patient clinical outcomes; however, the evaluation of such a model in primary care is nonexistent in Canada. This article describes the design for the evaluation of the implementation of Mobile Diabetes Education Teams (MDETs) in primary care settings in Canada. Methods/design This study will use a non-blinded, cluster-randomized controlled trial stepped wedge design to evaluate the Mobile Diabetes Education Teams' intervention in improving patient clinical and care process outcomes. A total of 1,200 patient charts at participating primary care sites will be reviewed for data extraction. Eligible patients will be those aged ≥18, who have type 2 diabetes and a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of ≥8%. Clusters (that is, primary care sites) will be randomized to the intervention and control group using a block randomization procedure within practice size as the blocking factor. A stepped wedge design will be used to sequentially roll out the intervention so that all clusters eventually receive the intervention. The time at which each cluster begins the intervention is randomized to one of the four roll out periods (0, 6, 12, and 18?months). Clusters that are randomized into the intervention later will act as the control for those receiving the intervention earlier. The primary outcome measure will be the difference in the proportion of patients who achieve the recommended HbA1c target of ≤7% between intervention and control groups. Qualitative work (in-depth interviews with primary care physicians, MDET educators and patients; and MDET educators’ field notes and debriefing sessions) will be undertaken to assess the implementation process and effectiveness of the MDET intervention. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01553266
机译:背景技术有证据表明,糖尿病教育者在初级保健中提供糖尿病自我管理支持可能会改善患者的护理过程和患者的临床结局。然而,在加拿大,这种对初级保健模式的评估尚不存在。本文介绍了用于评估加拿大初级保健机构中流动糖尿病教育团队(MDET)实施情况的设计。方法/设计本研究将使用非盲,整群随机对照试验阶梯楔形设计来评估移动糖尿病教育团队在改善患者临床和护理过程结果方面的干预。参与检查的初级保健场所的总共1200张患者病历将被审核以提取数据。符合条件的患者将是年龄≥18岁,患有2型糖尿病且血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)≥8%的患者。将使用在实践规模内的分组随机程序作为分组因素,将聚类(即初级保健场所)随机分配到干预组和对照组。阶梯式楔形设计将用于顺序推出干预措施,以便所有群集最终都接受干预措施。每个群集开始干预的时间被随机分配到四个推出周期(0、6、12和18个月)之一。后来被随机分配到干预中的聚类将作为那些较早接受干预的人的对照。主要结局指标是干预组和对照组之间达到建议的HbA1c目标≤7%的患者比例之差。定性工作(与初级保健医师,MDET教育者和患者进行深入访谈;以及MDET教育者的现场笔记和汇报会)将评估MDET干预措施的实施过程和有效性。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01553266

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号