...
首页> 外文期刊>Thoracic cancer. >Thymosin plus cisplatin with vinorelbine or gemcitabine for non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Thymosin plus cisplatin with vinorelbine or gemcitabine for non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:胸腺素加顺铂联合长春瑞滨或吉西他滨治疗非小细胞肺癌:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thymosin plus cisplatin with vinorelbine (NP)/gemcitabine with cisplatin (GP) program for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Knowledge, Chinese Biomedical Database and other databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing thymosin plus NP/GP with NP/GP alone for patients with NSCLC were eligible for our study. We evaluated the quality of included studies using Cochrane Handbook standards. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.0 software (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark).Results: Ten RCT including 724 patients were eligible. The results of our study showed that: compared with an NP program alone, thymosin plus NP could increase overall response rate (odds ratio (OR) 1.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–3.20), tumor control rate (OR 3.06; 95% CI: 1.36–6.88) and 1-year survival rate (OR 3.05; 95% CI: 1.34–6.96), improve the quality of life (OR 3.39; 95% CI: 1.54–7.47), CD4 (mean difference (MD) 6.7; 95% CI: 3.52–9.88) and NK cells (MD 6.53; 95% CI: 3.6–9.47). Compared with a GP program alone, thymosin plus GP could increase overall response rate (OR 1.67; 95% CI: 1.09–2.55), tumor control rate (OR 2.38; 95% CI: 1.01–5.62), improve quality of life (OR 3.84; 95% CI: 1.97–7.48), CD4 (MD 14.82; 95% CI: 8.05–21.59) and NK (MD 16.96; 95% CI: 4.90–29.03)Conclusion: Thymosin plus NP/GP is a better choice for patients with advanced NSCLC than NP/GP alone.
机译:目的:评价胸腺素加顺铂联合长春瑞滨(NP)/吉西他滨联合顺铂(GP)方案在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:我们搜索了PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,ISI知识网,中国生物医学数据库和其他数据库。比较NSCLC患者胸腺素加NP / GP与单独NP / GP的随机对照试验(RCT)符合我们的研究条件。我们使用Cochrane手册标准评估了纳入研究的质量。使用Review Manager 5.0软件(丹麦哥本哈根的Nordic Cochrane中心)进行数据分析。结果:包括724名患者在内的10例RCT入选。我们的研究结果表明:与单独的NP程序相比,胸腺肽加NP可以提高总缓解率(优势比(OR)1.86; 95%置信区间(CI)1.08-3.20),肿瘤控制率(OR 3.06;或95%CI:1.36-6.88)和1年生存率(OR 3.05; 95%CI:1.34-6.96),改善了生活质量(OR 3.39; 95%CI:1.54-7.47),CD4(平均差异( MD)6.7; 95%CI:3.52-9.88)和NK细胞(MD 6.53; 95%CI:3.6-9.47)。与单独的GP程序相比,胸腺肽加GP可以提高总体缓解率(OR 1.67; 95%CI:1.09–2.55),肿瘤控制率(OR 2.38; 95%CI:1.01-5.62),改善生活质量(OR 3.84; 95%CI:1.97-7.48),CD4(MD 14.82; 95%CI:8.05-21.59)和NK(MD 16.96; 95%CI:4.90-29.03)结论:胸腺肽加NP / GP是更好的选择晚期NSCLC患者比单纯NP / GP患者好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号