...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine and vinorelbine versus gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: from the German and Swiss Lung Cancer Study Group.
【24h】

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine and vinorelbine versus gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: from the German and Swiss Lung Cancer Study Group.

机译:吉西他滨和长春瑞滨与吉西他滨,长春瑞滨和顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机III期研究:来自德国和瑞士肺癌研究组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether cisplatin-based chemotherapy (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and cisplatin [GVP]) prolongs overall survival in comparison to cisplatin-free chemotherapy (gemcitabine and vinorelbine [GV]) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1999 and June 2001, 300 patients with NSCLC stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion or stage IV disease were randomly assigned to receive GV (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) + vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or GVP (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) + vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 + cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 2 every 3 weeks). Primary end point of the study was overall survival. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-seven patients (GV, 143 patients; GVP, 144 patients) were eligible for analysis. At the time of analysis, April 15, 2002, 209 patients (GV, 103 patients; GVP, 106 patients) of 287 patients had died (73%). No statistically significant difference was observed for overall survival (P =.73; median survival, 35.9 versus 32.4 weeks; 1-year survival rate, 33.6% versus 27.5%) as well as for event-free survival (P =.35; median time-to-event, 19.3 versus 22.3 weeks) between GV and GVP. Two hundred fourteen patients were assessable for best response. The overall response rates were 13.0% for GV versus 28.3% for GVP (P =.004; complete responders, 0% versus 3.8%; partial responders, 13.0% versus 24.5%). Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity was significantly lower in the GV treatment arm compared with GVP. No statistically significant difference in quality of life was observed. CONCLUSION: In this phase III study, the cisplatin-based GVP regimen showed no survival benefit as first-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC when compared with the cisplatin-free GV regimen, which was substantially better tolerated.
机译:目的:评估与以顺铂为基础的化疗(吉西他滨,长春瑞滨和顺铂[GVP])相比无顺铂的化疗(吉西他滨和长春瑞滨[GV])作为晚期非小剂量晚期患者的一线治疗是否能延长总体生存期细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。病人和方法:1999年9月至2001年6月,随机分配300例NSCLC IIIB期恶性胸腔积液或IV期疾病的患者接受GV(吉西他滨1000 mg / m(2)+长春瑞滨25 mg / m(2))。每3周的第1天和第8天)或GVP(第1天和第8天的吉西他滨1000 mg / m(2)+长春瑞滨25 mg / m(2)+第3天的顺铂75 mg / m(2)每3周)。该研究的主要终点是总体生存率。结果:287例患者(GV,143例; GVP,144例)符合分析条件。在分析时(2002年4月15日),有287名患者中的209名患者(GV,103例; GVP,106例)死亡(73%)。总体生存率(P = .73;中位生存期,分别为35.9和32.4周; 1年生存率,分别为33.6%和27.5%)和无事件生存率(P = .35;中位)均无统计学差异。 GV和GVP之间的事件发生时间分别为19.3和22.3周。 214名患者的最佳反应可评估。 GV的总体缓解率为13.0%,GVP的总体缓解率为28.3%(P = .004;完全缓解者为0%相对于3.8%;部分缓解者为13.0%相对于24.5%)。与GVP相比,GV治疗组的血液学和非血液学毒性显着降低。没有观察到生活质量的统计学显着差异。结论:在该III期研究中,与无顺铂的GV方案相比,基于顺铂的GVP方案在晚期NSCLC中作为一线化疗没有生存优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号