首页> 外文期刊>The Open Anatomy Journal >Comparative Anatomy, Anthropology and Archaeology as Case Studies on the Influence of Human Biases in Natural Sciences: The Origin of ‘Humans’, of ‘Behaviorally Modern Humans’ and of ‘Fully Civilized Humans’
【24h】

Comparative Anatomy, Anthropology and Archaeology as Case Studies on the Influence of Human Biases in Natural Sciences: The Origin of ‘Humans’, of ‘Behaviorally Modern Humans’ and of ‘Fully Civilized Humans’

机译:比较解剖学,人类学和考古学,以研究自然科学中人类偏见的影响:“人类”,“行为现代人类”和“完全文明人类”的起源

获取原文
       

摘要

Natural sciences are considered to be exact sciences. However, despite usually being effectively usually more ‘objective’ than for instance social sciences, they are not immune to a problem common to all sciences: the intrinsic psychological, sociological and/or historical biases of the scientists. In the present paper I will briefly discuss the influence of these biases in natural sciences, using anthropology, archaeology and comparative anatomy as case studies. I will specifically discuss how these influences have lead scientists to ‘actively search’ and supposedly ‘find’ data to support that the first ‘humans’, the first ‘behaviorally modern humans’ and the first ‘fully civilized or sophisticated humans’ were mostly originated in Europe, in some cases to the extent of fabricating false scientific evidence.
机译:自然科学被认为是精确的科学。但是,尽管通常比社会科学通常更具“客观性”,但它们也不能幸免于所有科学共同的问题:科学家固有的心理,社会学和/或历史偏见。在本文中,我将以人类学,考古学和比较解剖学为例,简要讨论这些偏见对自然科学的影响。我将具体讨论这些影响如何导致科学家“积极地搜索”并假定“寻找”数据以支持最初的“人类”,第一个“行为现代的人类”和第一个“完全文明的或成熟的人类”的起源在欧洲,在某些情况下会捏造虚假的科学证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号