首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of toxicological sciences >The performance of an in vitro skin sensitisation test, IL-8 Luc assay (OECD442E), and the integrated approach with direct peptide reactive assay (DPRA)
【24h】

The performance of an in vitro skin sensitisation test, IL-8 Luc assay (OECD442E), and the integrated approach with direct peptide reactive assay (DPRA)

机译:体外皮肤致敏测试,IL-8 Luc测定(OECD442E)的性能以及直接肽反应测定(DPRA)的综合方法

获取原文
           

摘要

In all current in vitro skin sensitisation assays, DMSO is used to dissolve water-insoluble chemicals. However, our previous study suggested the superiority of the modified IL-8 Luc assay (mIL-8 Luc), in which X-VIVOTM 15 is used to dissolve chemicals, over the original assay using DMSO (oIL-8 Luc). In this study, to confirm the superiority of the mIL-8 Luc, we first increased the number of chemicals examined and demonstrated the superiority of the mIL-8 Luc, in which the mIL-8 Luc provided 87.6% of sensitivity, 74.2% of specificity, and 84.6% of accuracy. Next, to clarify the cause of false negative judgment by the mIL-8 Luc, we examined the effects of physical properties of chemicals on judgment. The results demonstrated that high molecular weight, high LogKo/w, or poor water solubility, did not cause false negative judgment. When it was accepted as an OECD test guideline, the criteria of the mIL-8 Luc to determine sensitisers were modified to further decrease false negative judgment by poor solubility. By applying the new criteria, the test guideline IL-8 Luc assay (tgIL-8 Luc) improved sensitivity but decreased specificity and increased the number of chemicals that cannot be judged. To overcome this problem, we examined a simple combination of the tgIL-8 Luc with direct peptide reactive assay (DPRA), which could improve specificity and decrease the number of the chemicals that cannot be judged. These data suggest that the tgIL-8 Luc is a promising in vitro skin sensitisation assay in combination with other in vitro or in chemico methods.
机译:在目前所有的体外皮肤致敏试验中,DMSO用于溶解水不溶性化学物质。但是,我们先前的研究表明,使用X-VIVOTM 15溶解化学物质的改良IL-8 Luc测定法(mIL-8 Luc)优于使用DMSO的原始测定法(oIL-8 Luc)。在这项研究中,为了确认mIL-8 Luc的优越性,我们首先增加了所检查化学物质的数量,并证明了mIL-8 Luc的优越性,其中mIL-8 Luc提供了87.6%的灵敏度,74.2%的灵敏度。特异性和准确度的84.6%。接下来,为弄清mIL-8 Luc假阴性判断的原因,我们检查了化学物质的物理性质对判断的影响。结果表明,高分子量,高LogKo / w或较差的水溶性不会引起假阴性判断。当它被接受为OECD测试指南时,对mIL-8 Luc确定敏化剂的标准进行了修改,以进一步降低由于溶解度差而引起的假阴性判断。通过应用新标准,测试指南IL-8 Luc测定法(tgIL-8 Luc)提高了灵敏度,但降低了特异性,并增加了无法判断的化学物质的数量。为了克服这个问题,我们检查了tgIL-8 Luc与直接肽反应测定(DPRA)的简单组合,可以提高特异性并减少无法判断的化学物质的数量。这些数据表明,与其他体外或化学方法相结合,tgIL-8 Luc是一种有前途的体外皮肤致敏测定法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号