首页> 外文期刊>The JALT CALL Journal >An evaluation of automated writing assessment
【24h】

An evaluation of automated writing assessment

机译:自动写作评估的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper describes research done to empiri- cally study the efficacy of using Criterion, a commercial web-based writing evaluation platform, as a revision aid, especially within a class following the Process Writing pedagogy. This paper first describes the background and rationale for Criterion automated writing evaluation, the Process Writing approach, as well as the natural language processing tech- niques used by Criterion. In this study an essay was submitted to Criterion multiple times with variations in a single feature each time. By log- ging the results and comparing how Criterion scored each submission it is possible to deter- mine what components of an essay influence Criterion's scoring. The conclusions from these results suggest that Criterion alone is not an adequate revision aid for the developing writer.
机译:本文介绍了为深入研究使用Criterion(基于商业网络的写作评估平台)作为修订帮助而进行的研究,尤其是在遵循过程写作教学法的课堂中。本文首先介绍了Criterion自动写作评估的背景和原理,过程写作方法以及Criterion使用的自然语言处理技术。在这项研究中,一篇论文多次提交给Criterion,每次都有一个特征的变化。通过记录结果并比较Criterion对每个提交的评分方式,可以确定论文的哪些成分会影响Criterion的评分。从这些结果得出的结论表明,对于发展中的作家而言,仅“标准”还不足以进行修订。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号