...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology >A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Study Comparing Propofol Medium Chain/Long Chain Triglyceride And Propofol Medium Chain/Long Chain Triglyceride With Lignocaine On Injection Pain
【24h】

A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Study Comparing Propofol Medium Chain/Long Chain Triglyceride And Propofol Medium Chain/Long Chain Triglyceride With Lignocaine On Injection Pain

机译:异丙酚中链/长链甘油三酸酯和丙泊酚中链/长链甘油三酸酯与利多卡因注射痛比较的前瞻性随机双盲研究

获取原文
           

摘要

A common drawback of propofol is pain on injection and lignocaine is commonly mixed with propofol to reduce its incidence and severity. In this study we sought to compare the effectiveness of propofol medium chain and long chain triglyceride (MCT/LCT ) alone in comparison to propofol medium chain and long chain triglyceride (MCT/ LCT) premixed with lignocaine in preventing propofol pain on injection. 200 patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A received propofol – MCT/LCT premixed with normal saline and group B received propofol- MCT/LCT premixed with 20 mg lignocaine. The incidence of pain in group A was 63% compared to 15% in group B (Χ2 = 48.242 ,p< 0.001). To conclude propofol MCT/LCT alone provides no advantage to reduce pain on injection in comparison to propofol MCT/LCT premixed with lignocaine. Introduction Propofol is a popular intravenous anaesthetic agent providing smooth induction and rapid recovery from anaesthesia. However pain on injection is a major disadvantage with a reported incidence of approximately 70% when a standard formulation of propofol is administered with no intervention to reduce pain.(1) Several strategies have been applied to alleviate pain, such as previous administration of opioids or metoclopromide and adaptation of the temperature of the emulsion. The most frequently used method to reduce pain is the administration of lignocaine, either before propofol injection, with or without a tourniquet (2) or added to the propofol emulsion as a premixture.(1,3,4) The mechanism of pain relief can be two fold ; first by reduction of propofol in the aqueous phase and second by lignocaine acting as a stabiliser in the kinin cascade.(5) Injection pain has been attributed to the amount of free propofol in the aqueous phase of the emulsion. In 1997, Doenicke et al (6) advocated a reformulated lipid emulsion of propofol to alleviate injection pain. This reformulation of propofol contains both medium chain triglycerides (MCT) and long chain triglycerides (LCT) in equal proportions in contrast to usual LCT formulation. The amount of free propofol in a MCT/LCT emulsion is assumed to be less compared with propofol LCT thus causing less pain on injection. However recent studies have suggested that propofol MCT/LCT emulsion when used alone causes more pain on injection as compared to propofol LCT with lignocaine.(7,8,9)The aim of this study was to determine whether propofol in a reformulated MCT/LCT emulsion without further addition was more effective in preventing pain on injection as compared to propofol MCT/LCT with lignocaine and more frequently used standard LCT propofol with a premixture of lignocaine. Material and Methods Following approval by the institutional ethics committee and written informed consent, 300 ASA I-III patients aged 18-65 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia were recruited into this prospective randomised double blind study. Sample size was determined by performing a power analysis which showed that a minimum of 200 patients will be required for the study. Exclusion criteria were patients with ischemic heart disease and neurological problems, pregnant or lactating patients, those who were taking any analgesics before surgery, or those with known hypersensitivity to propofol or to any of the constituents of the emulsion (soy-bean oil, MCT, glycerol, egg lecithin, sodium oleate or water for injection).The drugs used were propofol –MCT/LCT (PropofolR-Lipuro, B Braun Ltd, Melsungen, Germany) and lignocaine hydrochloride 2% (XylocardR , AstraZeneca, India).The patients were assigned to 2 groups using computer generated randomizatiopn with 100 patients in each group. Group A received propofol – MCT/LCT premixed with normal saline ( 1 ml of normal saline added to 19 ml propofol-lipuro). Group B received propofol- MCT/LCT premixed with lignocaine (1 ml of 2% lignocaine added to 19 ml propofol- lipuro).Patients received no premedication. On arrival at the ope
机译:丙泊酚的常见缺点是注射时疼痛,利福卡因通常与丙泊酚混合以降低其发生率和严重程度。在这项研究中,我们试图比较预混有木质素的丙泊酚中链和长链甘油三酸酯(MCT / LCT)与预防性丙泊酚注射时丙泊酚中链和长链甘油三酸酯(MCT / LCT)的有效性。 200例患者随机分为两组。 A组接受丙泊酚– MCT / LCT与生理盐水预混合,B组接受丙泊酚-MCT / LCT与20 mg利多卡因预混合。 A组的疼痛发生率为63%,而B组为15%(Χ2= 48.242,p <0.001)。总而言之,与预混有利多卡因的丙泊酚MCT / LCT相比,单独使用丙泊酚MCT / LCT不能减轻注射时的疼痛。简介丙泊酚是一种流行的静脉麻醉剂,可平滑诱导并从麻醉中快速恢复。然而,注射时的疼痛是主要的缺点,当在不干预的情况下服用异丙酚标准制剂以减轻疼痛时,据报道的发生率约为70%。(1)已经采用了多种缓解疼痛的策略,例如先前使用了阿片类药物或甲吡氯胺和乳剂温度的适应性。最常用的减轻疼痛的方法是在异丙酚注射之前,有无止血带(2)或以预混合物的形式添加到丙泊酚乳剂中给予利多卡因(1,3,4)缓解疼痛的机制可以两倍;首先通过在水相中还原异丙酚,其次通过在激肽级联反应中用作稳定剂的利诺卡因。(5)注射疼痛归因于乳液水相中游离异丙酚的量。 1997年,Doenicke等人(6)提倡重新配制丙泊酚脂质乳剂以减轻注射疼痛。与通常的LCT配方相反,这种重新配制的异丙酚含有相等比例的中链甘油三酸酯(MCT)和长链甘油三酸酯(LCT)。假定与丙泊酚LCT相比,MCT / LCT乳液中游离丙泊酚的量较少,因此注射时引起的疼痛较小。然而,最近的研究表明,与使用利多卡因的丙泊酚LCT相比,单独使用丙泊酚MCT / LCT乳剂注射时会引起更多的疼痛感。(7,8,9)本研究的目的是确定在重新配制的MCT / LCT中丙泊酚是否与异丙酚MCT / LCT和利多卡因以及更常用的标准LCT异丙酚和利多卡因的预混料相比,不进一步添加乳化液在预防注射时疼痛更有效。材料和方法经机构伦理委员会批准并签署知情同意书后,计划在全麻下进行择期手术的300例年龄在18-65岁的ASA I-III患者被纳入这项前瞻性随机双盲研究。通过进行功效分析确定样本量,该分析表明该研究至少需要200名患者。排除标准是患有缺血性心脏病和神经系统疾病的患者,怀孕或哺乳期的患者,在手术前服用任何镇痛剂的患者,或对丙泊酚或乳化液的任何成分过敏的患者(大豆油,MCT,甘油,鸡蛋卵磷脂,油酸钠或注射用水)。所用药物为丙泊酚–MCT / LCT(丙泊酚R-Lipuro,B Braun Ltd,德国梅尔松根,德国)和盐酸利诺卡因2%(XylocardR,阿斯利康,印度)。使用计算机生成的随机分组法分为2组,每组100名患者。 A组接受丙泊酚– MCT / LCT与生理盐水预混合(将1 ml生理盐水加到19 ml异丙酚-lipuro中)。 B组接受预混有木质素的丙泊酚-MCT / LCT(向19ml异丙酚-lipuro中加入1ml 2%的木质素)。到达歌剧院

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号