首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics >Evaluation of marginal discrepancy of pressable ceramic veneer fabricated using CAD/CAM system: Additive and subtractive manufacturing
【24h】

Evaluation of marginal discrepancy of pressable ceramic veneer fabricated using CAD/CAM system: Additive and subtractive manufacturing

机译:使用CAD / CAM系统评估可压制陶瓷贴面的边际差异:加法和减法制造

获取原文
           

摘要

PURPOSE pThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal discrepancy of heat-pressed ceramic veneers manufactured using a CAD/CAM system. MATERIALS AND METHODS pThe ceramic veneers for the abutment of a maxillary left central incisor were designed using a CAD/CAM software program. Ten veneers using a micro-stereolithography apparatus (AM group), ten veneers using a five-axis milling machine (SM group), and ten veneers using a traditional free-hand wax technique (TW group) were prepared according to the respective manufacturing method. The ceramic veneers were also fabricated using a heat-press technique, and a silicone replica was used to measure their marginal discrepancy. The marginal discrepancies were measured using a digital microscope (×160 magnification). The data were analyzed using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H test. Finally, post-hoc comparisons were conducted using Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U tests (α=.05). RESULTS pThe mean±SD of the total marginal discrepancy was 99.68±28.01 μm for the AM group, 76.60±28.76 μm for the SM group, and 83.08±39.74 μm for the TW group. There were significant differences in the total marginal discrepancies of the ceramic veneers ( P .05). CONCLUSION pThe SM group showed a better fit than the AM and TW groups. However, all values were within the clinical tolerance. Therefore, CAD/CAM manufacturing methods can replace the traditional free-hand wax technique.
机译:目的>本研究的目的是评估使用CAD / CAM系统制造的热压陶瓷贴面的边际差异。材料与方法>使用CAD / CAM软件程序设计用于上颌左中切牙的基台的陶瓷贴面。根据相应的制造方法,准备了十个使用微立体光刻设备的贴面(AM组),十个使用五轴铣床的贴面(SM组)和十个使用传统徒手打蜡技术的贴面(TW组)。 。陶瓷贴面也使用热压技术制造,硅树脂仿品用于测量其边际差异。使用数字显微镜(×160放大倍率)测量边缘差异。使用非参数Kruskal-Wallis H检验分析数据。最后,使用Bonferroni校正的Mann-Whitney U检验(α= .05)进行事后比较。结果> AM组总边缘差异的平均值±SD为99.68±28.01μm,SM组为76.60±28.76μm,TW组为83.08±39.74μm。陶瓷贴面的总边际差异存在显着差异(P <.05)。结论> SM组的适应性优于AM和TW组。但是,所有值均在临床耐受范围内。因此,CAD / CAM制造方法可以替代传统的徒手打蜡技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号