首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Pain, Symptom Control and Palliative Care >The Transition Process from Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia to As-Needed Analgesia in Postoperative Situations – A Preliminary Look at the Issue
【24h】

The Transition Process from Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia to As-Needed Analgesia in Postoperative Situations – A Preliminary Look at the Issue

机译:术后患者自控静脉镇痛到按需镇痛的过渡过程–初步探讨

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: Several studies have shown that patients often receive inadequate treatment for postoperative pain. However, there is little literature focusing on the transition process from patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (IV-PCA) and systematic (regular or as needed [PRN]) analgesia in the postoperative context. The purpose of this descriptive study is to describe the types of medication received by postoperative patients during the transition between IV-PCA and PRN analgesia, and to describe the pain assessments performed by nurses during this transition (n=36). Method: A retrospective analysis of participants' patient records by checking their medical history, analgesics prescribed and administered, and nurses' pain assessments.Results: When IV-PCA was discontinued, 52.8% of participants had no documented pain assessment and 75.0% received no PRN medication. Only 5 participants (24.8%) received analgesia. A double-entry table of the data indicates no significant relationship between the presence of a pain assessment and the presence of PRN analgesia when IV-PCA was stopped. Conclusion: This study confirms the need to review postoperative pain assessment and management procedures. Nurses must receive training in pain assessment and management. Introduction Postoperative pain is an important issue. Non-relieved pain is a major physiological stress (1) that may increase heart rate and blood pressure, slow gastric emptying, provoke endocrine imbalances and reduce breathing capacity, among other problems (2). Immobility due to pain in turn promotes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (1,3-5). It also has psychological effects, such as increased anxiety, sleep disorders, fatigue, agitation, irritability, aggressiveness, and above all emotional suffering and distress (2,6,7). People with a high level of postoperative pain are also more likely to develop delirium (8). Ultimately, these complications will unnecessarily prolong the patient's hospital stay (7), increasing health care costs, and can even turn regular pain into chronic pain (3,7,9,10). Considering all the implications of poorly-relieved postoperative pain, it is essential to ensure that relief is provided successfully.To this end, several therapeutic alternatives are available, such as nurse-controlled systematic (regular or as needed [PRN]) analgesia, ongoing (intravenous, epidural) analgesia, and patient-controlled (intravenous or transdermal) analgesia (7,11). In recent decades, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (IV-PCA) has emerged as the preferred therapeutic drug-administration method to efficiently manage postoperative pain (11). With IV-PCA, the patient self-injects a dose of analgesic, usually morphine or hydromorphone, administered parenterally via a pump that has been pre-programmed to the patient's clinical parameters by the anesthesia department (12,13). Although IV-PCA remains the preferred therapeutic method of postoperative pain management, several studies have reported mixed results concerning its effectiveness, particularly as regards the reduction and alleviation of postoperative pain (12,14,15). Nonetheless, IV-PCA improves patient satisfaction (11,13-16), outcome (11,16,17), feelings of control (4,12,15,18) and engagement (4). It also helps reduce analgesic gaps (13), anxiety (18) and feelings of helplessness (4). Nursing staff also acknowledge the benefits of IV-PCA for patients (18), since it permits greater flexibility in the administration of analgesics (11) and decreases patients' use of nursing staff (12), which in turn decreases the nurses’ workload (13,19). However, IV-PCA does not fit all patients (4,11), particularly those with cognitive disabilities, psychological disorders, a decreased level of consciousness (13) or a significant mobility impairment (11). It is therefore essential to carefully select patients eligible for IV-PCA (4,11-13,17,18). Usually, IV-PCA is used in the first 24-48 hours after surgery. Subsequent
机译:目的:几项研究表明,患者术后疼痛常未得到充分的治疗。然而,在术后情况下,很少有文献关注患者自控静脉镇痛(IV-PCA)和系统性(常规或根据需要[PRN])镇痛的过渡过程。这项描述性研究的目的是描述在IV-PCA和PRN镇痛之间过渡期间术后患者接受的药物类型,并描述在此过渡期间护士进行的疼痛评估(n = 36)。方法:通过检查参与者的病历,处方药和镇痛药以及护士的疼痛评估对患者的病历进行回顾性分析。结果:停用IV-PCA时,没有记录的疼痛评估为52.8%,没有接受评估的参与者为75.0% PRN药物。只有5名参与者(24.8%)接受了镇痛。数据的重复输入表指示在停止IV-PCA时,疼痛评估的存在与PRN镇痛的存在之间没有显着关系。结论:这项研究证实了需要审查术后疼痛评估和管理程序。护士必须接受疼痛评估和管理方面的培训。简介术后疼痛是一个重要问题。不能缓解的疼痛是主要的生理压力(1),除其他问题外,它可能会增加心率和血压,减慢胃排空,引起内分泌失衡并降低呼吸能力(2)。疼痛引起的不动反过来又促进深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞(1,3-5)。它还具有心理影响,例如焦虑增加,睡眠障碍,疲劳,躁动,易怒,攻击性,尤其是情绪上的痛苦和困扰(2、6、7)。术后疼痛高的人也更容易出现del妄(8)。最终,这些并发症将不必要地延长患者的住院时间(7),增加医疗保健成本,甚至可能将常规疼痛转变为慢性疼痛(3,7,9,10)。考虑到术后疼痛缓解的所有影响,至关重要的是要确保成功地缓解疼痛。为此,有几种治疗方法可供选择,例如护士控制的系统性(常规或根据需要[PRN])镇痛,正在进行中。 (静脉,硬膜外)镇痛,以及患者控制的(静脉或透皮)镇痛(7,11)。近几十年来,患者自控静脉镇痛(IV-PCA)成为有效治疗术后疼痛的首选治疗药物给药方法(11)。使用IV-PCA,患者可以自行注射一定剂量的镇痛药,通常是吗啡或氢吗啡酮,这些药物是通过麻醉科通过预编程为患者临床参数的泵进行肠胃外给药的(12,13)。尽管IV-PCA仍然是术后疼痛治疗的首选治疗方法,但一些研究报告了其有效性的好坏参半,特别是在减轻和减轻术后疼痛方面(12、14、15)。尽管如此,IV-PCA可以提高患者满意度(11,13-16),结局(11,16,17),控制感(4、12、15、18)和参与度(4)。它还有助于减少止痛间隙(13),焦虑(18)和无助感(4)。护理人员也认识到IV-PCA对患者的好处(18),因为它允许在镇痛药的给药方面有更大的灵活性(11)并减少了患者对护理人员的使用(12),从而减少了护士的工作量( 13,19)。但是,IV-PCA并不适合所有患者(4,11),尤其是那些患有认知障碍,心理障碍,意识水平下降(13)或严重的运动障碍(11)的患者。因此,必须仔细选择符合IV-PCA标准的患者(4,11-13,17,18)。通常,IV-PCA用于手术后的最初24-48小时。后续的

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号