首页> 外文期刊>Journal of opioid management >Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids.
【24h】

Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids.

机译:曲马多静脉自控镇痛与阿片类药物静脉自控镇痛的术后镇痛效果比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with tramadol is an accepted method to deliver postoperative analgesia outside North America; however, the analgesic efficacy of this analgesic agent when compared with IVPCA with opioids is uncertain. As such, the authors undertook a systematic review to compare the analgesic efficacy of IVPCA tramadol with that of IVPCA with opioids. METHODS: The authors used the National Library of Medicine's Medline database to search for terms related to tramadol and patient-controlled analgesia. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IVPCA tramadol with IVPCA opioid and RCTs published in the English language. Relevant data were abstracted from accepted studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 4.2.10 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2004). A random effects model was used. RESULTS: A total of 190 abstracts were obtained from the above search, and a total of 12 RCTs met the above inclusion criteria. There was no difference in weighted visual analog scale pain scores between IVPCA tramadol versus IVPCA opioid at 48 hours postoperatively or risk of sedation or fatigue. IVPCA tramadol was associated with a higher odds of postoperative nausea and vomiting [odds ratio (OR) = 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.07-2.14) but a lower odds of pruritus (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.19-0.98). DISCUSSION: IVPCA tramadol appears to produce similar pain scores when compared with that from IVPCA opioids; however, the side effect profile is different between the two groups. Because of the relatively small sample size, no determination of the relative "safety" (eg, respiratory depression) of one regimen over the other can be made, and larger RCTs would be needed for such a determination.
机译:背景:曲马多的静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)是在北美以外地区进行术后镇痛的一种公认方法。但是,与含阿片类药物的IVPCA相比,该镇痛药的镇痛效果尚不确定。因此,作者进行了系统评价,比较了IVPCA曲马多和IVPCA与阿片类药物的镇痛效果。方法:作者使用美国国家医学图书馆的Medline数据库搜索与曲马多和患者控制的镇痛有关的术语。纳入标准为随机对照试验(RCT),将IVPCA曲马多与IVPCA阿片类药物和以英语发布的RCT进行比较。相关数据摘自已接受的研究。使用RevMan 4.2.10(Cochrane协作,2004年)进行荟萃分析。使用随机效应模型。结果:通过以上搜索共获得190个摘要,符合上述纳入标准的共有12个RCT。术后48小时,IVPCA曲马多与IVPCA阿片类药物在加权视觉模拟量表疼痛评分上没有差异,也没有镇静或疲劳的风险。 IVPCA曲马多的术后恶心和呕吐几率较高[几率(OR)= 1.52,95%置信区间(CI)= 1.07-2.14),但瘙痒的几率较低(OR = 0.43,95%CI = 0.19 -0.98)。讨论:与IVPCA类阿片类药物相比,IVPCA曲马多似乎产生相似的疼痛评分。但是,两组的副作用不同。由于样本量相对较小,因此无法确定一种方案相对于另一种方案的相对“安全性”(例如,呼吸抑制),因此需要较大的RCT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号