首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain management and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a retrospective analysis of 3,042 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015
【24h】

Effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain management and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a retrospective analysis of 3,042 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015

机译:硬膜外自控镇痛与静脉内自控镇痛对胃癌切除术后术后疼痛管理和近期预后的影响:2010年至2015年连续3,042例患者的回顾性分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Effective postoperative analgesia is essential for rehabilitation after surgery. Many studies have compared different methods of postoperative pain management for open abdominal surgery. However, the conclusions were inconsistent and controversial. In addition, few studies have focused on gastric cancer (GC) resection. This study aimed to determine the effects of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) on postoperative pain management and short-term recovery after GC resection compared with those of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). Methods: We analyzed retrospectively collected data on patients with non-metastatic GC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 who underwent resection in a university hospital. PCIA and PCEA documented by the acute pain service team were retrospectively analyzed. A propensity score-matched analysis that incorporated preoperative variables was used to compare the short-term outcomes between the PCIA and PCEA groups. Results: In total, 3,042 patients were identified for analysis. Propensity score matching resulted in 917 patients in each group. The PCEA group exhibited lower pain scores in the recovery room and on the first and second postoperative days ( P =0.0005, P =0.0065, and P =0.0034 respectively). The time to the first passage of flatus after surgery was shorter in the PCEA group than in the PCIA group ( P =0.032). The length of the hospital stay was 12.6±7.2 and 11.8±6.6 days in the PCEA and PCIA groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the length of hospital stay or the incidence of complications after surgery. Conclusion: PCEA provided more effective postoperative pain management and a shorter time to the first passage of flatus than PCIA after GC resection. However, it did not have an effect on the length of hospital stay or the incidence of postoperative complications.
机译:背景:有效的术后镇痛对于术后康复至关重要。许多研究比较了开放式腹部手术术后疼痛管理的不同方法。但是,结论是不一致和有争议的。此外,很少有研究集中在胃癌(GC)切除术上。这项研究旨在确定患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)与患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)相比,对GC切除术后术后疼痛管理和短期恢复的影响。方法:我们回顾性收集了2010年至2015年间在大学医院接受切除的确诊为非转移性GC的患者的数据。回顾性分析急性疼痛服务团队记录的PCIA和PCEA。结合术前变量的倾向评分匹配分析用于比较PCIA组和PCEA组之间的短期结果。结果:总共确定了3,042例患者进行分析。倾向得分匹配导致每组917例患者。 PCEA组在恢复室以及术后第一天和第二天表现出较低的疼痛评分(分别为P = 0.0005,P = 0.0065和P = 0.0034)。 PCEA组比PCIA组术后肠胃气第一次通行的时间短(P = 0.032)。 PCEA和PCIA组的住院时间分别为12.6±7.2天和11.8±6.6天。住院时间或术后并发症发生率均无显着差异。结论:与GC切除后的PCIA相比,PCEA可提供更有效的术后疼痛管理,并缩短首次出现肠胃气的时间。但是,它对住院时间或术后并发症的发生率没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号