首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Radiology >The Incidence Of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Or Radiocontrast Nephropathy
【24h】

The Incidence Of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Or Radiocontrast Nephropathy

机译:造影剂肾病或放射性造影剂肾病的发生率

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Most studies of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) or radiocontrast nephropathy (RCN) have been derived from intra-arterial administration of contrast and percutaneous coronary intervention, the results of which may not be easily applicable in radiology, where most contrast administration is via the intravenous route. The purpose of this study is to document the rate of CIN/RCN in patients undergoing computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the head and/or neck, who were given contrast via the intravenous route.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study involving a random sample of 594 patients with normal serum creatinine and normal estimated glomerular filtration rate who had CTA of the head and/or neck.RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty eight patients (38.39%) had a decrease in serum creatinine, 212 patients (35.69%) had no change in serum creatinine, and 154 patients (25.93%) had an increase in serum creatinine after contrast administration. There were 2 patients (0.3%) who had greater than 0.5 mg/dL increase in 48-hour serum creatinine, 40 (6.7%) patients who had 25% or greater increase in serum creatinine, and 2 patients (0.3%) who had greater than 0.5 mg/dL increase serum creatinine and 25% or greater increase in serum creatinine 48 hours after contrast administration.CONCLUSION: The rate of CIN/RCN is 0.3-6.7% depending on the definition used. CIN/RCN is a rare complication in patients given intravenous contrast. The intravenous administration of contrast for CTA of the head and neck is safe, and may be used in routine evaluation of stroke and trauma. INTRODUCTION Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) or radiocontrast nephropathy (RCN) is acute renal failure occurring after contrast administration. An accepted definition of CIN/RCN is increase of serum creatinine of > 0.5 mg/dL or 25% above baseline within 48 hours after contrast administration. The pathophysiology of CIN/RCN is not clear but contrast may have ischemic and direct toxic effect on renal tubular cells. The most important risk factors of CIN/RCN are pre-existing renal insufficiency and diabetes. The incidence of CIN/RCN is highly variable, depending on the patient population, length of patient follow-up, definition of CIN/RCN, type of procedure, type and dose of contrast used, and route of contrast administration (1-11).Most of the studies of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) or radiocontrast nephropathy (RCN) have been derived from intra-arterial administration of contrast (98.7%) (2), and percutaneous coronary intervention, the results of which may not be easily applicable in radiology, where most contrast administration is via the intravenous route. Although most studies of CIN/RCN have been based on changes in serum creatinine, serum creatinine is not a reliable measure of renal impairment. Serum creatinine is affected by many factors including age, sex, and ethnicity. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a more appropriate assessment of renal function because it takes into account age, sex, and ethnicity of the patients (11-19).Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the head and neck are routinely used in the evaluation of acute stroke and acute trauma. The intravenous administration of contrast is associated with the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) or radiocontrast nephropathy (RCN). The aim of this study is to document the rate of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) or radiocontrast nephropathy (RCN) in patients undergoing CTA of the head and/or neck, who were given contrast via the intravenous route. CIN/RCN is diagnosed by changes in serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as determined by the older Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study and the newer Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. I believe that this is the first time that CIN/RCN has been diagnosed by changes in serum creatinine and e
机译:背景与目的:大多数造影剂诱发的肾病(CIN)或放射性对比肾病(RCN)的研究均来自动脉内造影剂和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,其结果可能不容易应用于放射学,而大多数造影剂通过静脉内途径给药。这项研究的目的是记录接受头颅和/或颈部计算机X线断层血管造影(CTA)的患者的CIN / RCN率,并通过静脉内途径进行对比。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性研究,涉及随机抽取594例血清肌酐正常且估计肾小球滤过率正常且头部和/或颈部CTA的患者。结果:208例患者(38.39%)的血清肌酐降低,212例患者(35.69) %)的血清肌酐没有变化,154例(25.93%)的患者在对比剂给药后血清肌酐升高。有2名患者(0.3%)的血肌酐水平在48小时内增加了0.5 mg / dL以上; 40(6.7%)名患者的血肌酐水平增加了25%或更高;还有2名患者(0.3%)的血肌酐水平增加了对比剂给药后48小时,大于0.5 mg / dL可使血清肌酐增加,血清肌酐增加25%或更多。结论:根据所用的定义,CIN / RCN的发生率为0.3-6.7%。在静脉内造影的情况下,CIN / RCN是一种罕见的并发症。头颈CTA的对比剂静脉内注射是安全的,可用于中风和创伤的常规评估。引言造影剂肾病(CIN)或放射性造影剂肾病(RCN)是在给予造影剂后发生的急性肾衰竭。 CIN / RCN的公认定义是在对比剂给药后48小时内,血清肌酐增加> 0.5 mg / dL或比基线高25%。 CIN / RCN的病理生理学尚不清楚,但对比可能对肾小管细胞有缺血性和直接毒性作用。 CIN / RCN的最重要危险因素是既往存在的肾功能不全和糖尿病。 CIN / RCN的发生率是高度可变的,具体取决于患者人群,患者随访时间,CIN / RCN的定义,操作类型,使用的对比剂类型和剂量以及对比剂施用途径(1-11)造影剂诱发的肾病(CIN)或放射性对比肾病(RCN)的大多数研究均来自动脉内给予造影剂(98.7%)(2)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,其结果可能不容易适用于放射学,其中大多数对比剂管理是通过静脉内途径进行的。尽管大多数CIN / RCN研究都是基于血清肌酐的变化,但血清肌酐并不是肾功能损害的可靠指标。血清肌酐受许多因素影响,包括年龄,性别和种族。肾小球滤过率(GFR)或估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)是更合适的肾功能评估,因为它考虑了患者的年龄,性别和种族(11-19)。头和颈通常用于评估急性中风和急性创伤。静脉注射造影剂与造影剂诱发的肾病(CIN)或放射性对比肾病(RCN)的风险有关。这项研究的目的是记录接受头和/或颈CTA的患者中通过静脉途径给予对比的对比剂诱发的肾病(CIN)或放射性对比肾病(RCN)的发生率。 CIN / RCN由血清肌酐的变化和估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)来诊断,肾病滤过率由更老的肾脏疾病饮食(MDRD)研究和较新的慢性肾脏病流行病学协作(CKD-EPI)方程确定。我相信这是首次通过血清肌酐和血红蛋白的变化诊断出CIN / RCN

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号