首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of Epigenetics and Neuroscience: Perfecting People
【24h】

Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of Epigenetics and Neuroscience: Perfecting People

机译:书籍:被科学蒙蔽的人:表观遗传学和神经科学的社会含义:使人完善

获取原文
           

摘要

David Wastell and Susan White Policy Press, 2017, HB, 304 pp, £ 21.59, 978-1447322344Science is one big story. Or, more accurately, it is lots of stories: conflicting, contested, merging, evolving — and sometimes ossifying, constraining, and distorting. Wittgenstein referred to the ‘railway tracks’ of science: the unspoken assumptions and shared ways of thinking within a scientific community, without which science cannot progress, and Thomas Kuhn talked of research paradigms: shared and evolving ways of conceptualising, theorising, empirically studying, and arguing about scientific topics.In their critique of an emerging new paradigm, David Wastell (a cognitive neuroscientist) and Sue White (a social scientist) offer an interdisciplinary text in two parts: ‘Getting to grips with the thought styles’ (an overview of the shared assumptions, practices, and methodologies on which modern neuroscience is based) and ‘Fixing real people’ (a critique of contemporary empirical findings and applications of neuroscience, especially in relation to social disadvantage).In Part 1, the authors explain that neuroscience asks questions like ‘Which part of the brain is responsible for which function?’ and ‘What happens when that part of the brain is damaged?’ A core assumption, which many neuroscientists share but these authors emphatically …
机译:David Wastell和Susan White Policy Press,2017年,HB,304页,21.59英镑,978-1447322344科学是一个大故事。或者,更准确地说,有很多故事:冲突,争吵,合并,发展-有时僵化,约束和扭曲。维特根斯坦(Wittgenstein)提到了科学的“轨道”:科学界内深不可测的假设和共同的思维方式,否则科学就无法进步,托马斯·库恩(Thomas Kuhn)谈到了研究范式:概念,理论,实证研究,方法的共同和发展方式,在对新兴的范式进行批判的过程中,大卫·韦斯特(David Wastell)(认知神经科学家)和苏·怀特(Sue White)(社会科学家)在两部分中提供了跨学科的文本:“掌握思维方式”(概述,现代神经科学所基于的共同假设,实践和方法)和“固定真实的人”(对神经科学的当代经验发现和应用的批评,特别是与社会劣势有关)。在第一部分中,作者解释说:神经科学提出这样的问题:“大脑的哪个部分负责哪个功能?”和“大脑的那个部分是达摩时会发生什么? ged?’这是许多神经科学家所共有的核心假设,但这些作者着重强调…

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号