首页> 外文期刊>The bone & joint journal. >Cost-effective peri-operative pain management: assuring a happy patient after total knee arthroplasty.
【24h】

Cost-effective peri-operative pain management: assuring a happy patient after total knee arthroplasty.

机译:具有成本效益的围手术期疼痛处理:在全膝关节置换术后确保患者满意。

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal regimen for the management of pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of different protocols implemented at a large, urban, academic medical centre. Between September 2013 and September 2015, we used a series of modifications to our standard regimen for the management of pain after TKA. In May 2014, there was a department-wide transition from protocols focused on femoral nerve blocks (FNB) to periarticular injections of liposomal bupivacaine. In February 2015, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was removed from the protocol while continuing liposomal bupivacaine injections. Quality measures and hospital costs were compared between the three protocols. The cohort being treated with PCA-less liposomal bupivacaine injections had a significantly higher percentage of patients who were discharged to their home (p = 0.010) and a significantly shorter length of stay (p < 0.001). Patient-reported Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores relating to pain being "well-controlled" and "overall pain management" also favoured this cohort (p = 0.214 and p?= 0.463, respectively), in which cost was significantly lower compared with the other two cohorts (p = 0.005). The replacement of FNBs injections and the removal of PCAs, both of which are known to be associated with high rates of adverse outcomes, and the addition of liposomal bupivacaine periarticular injections to a multimodal pain regimen, led to improvements in many quality measures, HCAHPS pain scores, and cost-effectiveness.
机译:这项研究的目的是通过比较在大型的城市学术医疗中心实施的不同方案的结果和成本效益,确定治疗全膝关节置换术(TKA)后疼痛的最佳方案。在2013年9月至2015年9月之间,我们对TKA术后疼痛的标准治疗方案进行了一系列修改。 2014年5月,在整个部门范围内,从专注于股神经阻滞(FNB)的方案过渡到关节腔注射布比卡因脂质体。 2015年2月,从协议中移除了患者自控镇痛(PCA),同时继续进行脂质体布比卡因注射。在这三个方案之间比较了质量指标和医院费用。接受无PCA脂质体布比卡因注射治疗的队列中出院患者的百分比显着更高(p = 0.010),住院时间明显较短(p <0.001)。患者报告的医疗保健提供者和系统的医院消费者评估(HCAHPS)分数与“被良好控制的疼痛”和“总体疼痛管理”有关的得分也偏爱该队列(分别为p = 0.214和p?= 0.463),其中成本与其他两个队列相比明显降低(p = 0.005)。众所周知,FNBs注射的替换和PCA的去除均与不良反应的高发生率有关,多模态镇痛方案中增加了脂质体布比卡因关节周围注射,导致许多质量指标得到改善,HCAHPS疼痛得分和成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号