首页> 外文期刊>The Angle orthodontist. >Interaction between deglutition, tongue posture, and malocclusion: A comparison of intraoral compartment formation in subjects with neutral occlusion or different types of malocclusion
【24h】

Interaction between deglutition, tongue posture, and malocclusion: A comparison of intraoral compartment formation in subjects with neutral occlusion or different types of malocclusion

机译:脱水,舌头姿势和错牙合之间的相互作用:中性咬合或不同类型错牙合患者口腔内隔室形成的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective:? To test the null hypothesis of no significant difference in terms of intraoral pressure curve characteristics assessed simultaneously at the subpalatal space (SPS) and the vestibular space (VS), during different oral postures, between four groups with either an Angle Class II/1 (II1), Angle Class II/2 (II2), anterior open bite (O) malocclusion, or a neutral occlusion control group (I). Materials and Methods:? Intraoral pressure recordings were performed simultaneously in the VS and SPS of 69 consecutive subjects (nII1 = 15; nII2 = 17; nO = 17; nI = 20; mean age/standard deviation 18.43/6.60 years). Assessments included defined sections of open mouth posture (OMP, 30 seconds), anteriorly closed mouth condition (60 seconds), dynamics by a tongue-repositioning maneuver (TRM, 60 seconds), swallowing, and positive pressure generation (PP, 10 seconds). Interactions of malocclusion, compartment location, and posture on pressure curve characteristics were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests, adopting an α level of 5%. Results:? Globally significant group differences were detected at the VS (plateau duration and median peak heights during TRM; area under pressure curve [AUC] during PP) and SPS (AUC during TRM and PP). Subjects with anteriorly nonopen dental configurations (groups I and II2) were able to keep negative pressure levels at the VS for longer time periods during TRM, compared to groups O and II1. Conclusions:? The null hypothesis was rejected for mean VS plateau durations and peak heights and for SPS AUC. Negative pressures at the VS may stabilize outer soft tissues passively and may explain the dental arch form shaping effect by mimic muscles.
机译:目的:?为了检验在不同的口腔姿势期间,在四组角度为II / 1级的两组之间同时在pal下间隙(SPS)和前庭间隙(VS)评估的口腔内压力曲线特征方面无显着差异的零假设。 (II1),II / 2级(II2)角,前开口咬(O)错牙合或中性咬合对照组(I)。材料和方法:?在69位连续受试者的VS和SPS中同时进行口内压力记录(nII1 = 15; nII2 = 17; nO = 17; nI = 20;平均年龄/标准差18.43 / 6.60年)。评估包括确定的张开姿势姿势(OMP,30秒),前闭嘴状态(60秒),舌头复位动作的动态变化(TRM,60秒),吞咽和正压产生(PP,10秒) 。通过Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U检验分析了咬合不正,隔室位置和姿势对压力曲线特征的相互作用,α水平为5%。结果:?在VS(TRM期间的高原持续时间和中位峰高; PP期间的压力曲线下面积[AUC])和SPS(TRM和PP期间的AUC)处检测到了全球显着的群体差异。与O组和II1组相比,TRM期间具有前牙非开放性牙齿构造(I和II2组)的受试者能够在VS保持负压水平更长的时间。结论:?对于平均VS高原持续时间和峰值高度以及SPS AUC,拒绝了原假设。 VS处的负压可能会被动地稳定外部软组织,并可能解释模拟肌肉对牙弓形状的塑造作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号