...
首页> 外文期刊>Technology in cancer research & treatment. >Toxicity and Outcome of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy versus 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis
【24h】

Toxicity and Outcome of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy versus 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis

机译:强度调节放疗与3维适形放疗对口咽癌的毒性和结果:配对分析。

获取原文
           

摘要

Because of the scarcity of randomized trials comparing toxicity and outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), we performed a matched-pair analysis from prospectively collected data from the Head and Neck Tumor Registry of our institution. In the absence of phase III trials, we believe this approach provides the highest quality data possible. Ninety-two patients treated with 3DCRT were matched (1:1) to 92 patients treated with IMRT for 9 potential predictive factors for toxicity and outcome: gender, age, T-stage, N-stage, tumor subsite, unilateral neck irradiation, chemotherapy, neck dissection and boost technique. Groups were compared for acute and late toxicity, locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Oncologic outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and toxicity was analyzed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. The overall incidence of grade 3 acute toxicity was significantly reduced by IMRT, compared to 3DCRT (45% vs. 70%, p = 0.001). The need for tube feeding was reduced from 50% to 37% (p = 0.04). The 3-year actuarial incidence of grade ≥2 late toxicity was also significantly reduced by IMRT, compared to 3DCRT (20% vs. 45%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The incidence of grade ≥2 late dysphagia and xerostomia for IMRT vs. 3DCRT were 10% vs. 31% for dysphagia, p = 0.004 and 13% vs. 37%, for xerostomia, respectively (p = 0.001). The 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of LRC, DFS, and OS for IMRT vs. 3DCRT were 90% vs. 82% (p = 0.1), 82% vs. 76% (p = 0.3), and 72% vs. 64% (p = 0.2), respectively. In conclusion, the presented nonrandomized comparative study of well-matched groups demonstrates the superiority of IMRT vs. 3DCRT for OPC by significantly reducing radiation-induced toxicity without jeopardizing outcomes. The improved therapeutic ratio achieved by the use of IMRT would allow dose escalation of radiotherapy to further improve outcomes of patients with OPC.
机译:由于缺乏比较口咽癌(OPC)和3D适形放疗(3DCRT)的毒性和强度调节放疗(IMRT)结果的随机试验,我们从前瞻性收集的头颈部数据中进行了配对分析我们机构的肿瘤登记处。在没有进行III期试验的情况下,我们认为这种方法可以提供最高质量的数据。将92例接受3DCRT治疗的患者与92例接受IMRT治疗的患者相匹配(1:1),以了解9种潜在的毒性和预后预测因素:性别,年龄,T期,N期,肿瘤亚部位,单侧颈部照射,化学疗法,颈部解剖和增强技术。比较各组的急性和晚期毒性,局部区域控制(LRC),无病生存期(DFS)和总体生存期(OS)。使用Kaplan-Meier分析评估肿瘤结局,并根据《不良事件通用术语标准》 v3.0分析毒性。与3DCRT相比,IMRT显着降低了3级急性毒性的总发生率(45%对70%,p = 0.001)。管饲的需要量从50%减少到37%(p = 0.04)。与3DCRT相比,IMRT也显着降低了≥2级晚期毒性的3年精算发生率(分别为20%和45%; p <0.0001)。 IMRT与3DCRT≥2级晚期吞咽困难和口干症的发生率分别为吞咽困难的10%和31%,口干症的发生率分别为p = 0.004和13%vs. 37%(p = 0.001)。针对IMRT与3DCRT的LRC,DFS和OS的3年Kaplan-Meier估计分别为90%对82%(p = 0.1),82%对76%(p = 0.3)和72%vs.分别为64%(p = 0.2)。总而言之,目前进行的对匹配组的非随机比较研究通过显着降低辐射诱发的毒性而不损害结果,证明了IMRT与3DCRT在OPC方面的优势。通过使用IMRT获得的改善的治疗率将使放射治疗的剂量增加,从而进一步改善OPC患者的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号