首页> 外文期刊>Technology in cancer research & treatment. >A Network Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Value of Different Imaging Methods for Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Cervical Cancer
【24h】

A Network Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Value of Different Imaging Methods for Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Cervical Cancer

机译:网络荟萃分析不同影像学方法对宫颈癌淋巴结转移的诊断价值

获取原文
       

摘要

We performed this network meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic value of 4 imaging methods (magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and diffusion-weighted imaging) for diagnosing lymph node metastases in cervical cancer. Diagnostic tests regarding different imaging methods to diagnose lymph node metastases in cervical cancer were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase electronic databases from inception to December 2016. Direct and indirect evidence was performed to calculate the odds ratio and to draw the surface under the cumulative ranking curves of the 4 imaging methods for diagnosing lymph node metastases in cervical cancer. Sixteen eligible diagnostic tests were included in this network meta-analysis. The results of network meta-analysis demonstrate that in comparison with the diffusion-weighted imaging, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of positron emission tomography were relatively higher. Additionally, the results further indicate that compared with other diagnosis method, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of positron emission tomography had a higher trend. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve results indicated that in terms of positive likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio, positron emission tomography had a relatively higher diagnostic value for lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. Our findings indicate that positron emission tomography might have a relatively higher diagnostic value for lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer.
机译:我们进行了该网络荟萃分析,比较了四种成像方法(磁共振成像,正电子发射断层扫描,计算机断层扫描和扩散加权成像)对宫颈癌淋巴结转移的诊断价值。从开始到2016年12月,从Cochrane图书馆,PubMed和Embase电子数据库中检索了有关诊断宫颈癌淋巴结转移的不同成像方法的诊断测试。进行了直接和间接的证据来计算比值比并在诊断宫颈癌淋巴结转移的四种成像方法的累积排名曲线。该网络荟萃分析包括十六项合格的诊断测试。网络荟萃分析的结果表明,与扩散加权成像相比,正电子发射断层扫描的正似然比,负似然比和诊断比值比相对较高。另外,结果进一步表明,与其他诊断方法相比,正电子发射断层扫描的正似然比,负似然比和诊断比值比具有更高的趋势。累积排名曲线结果下方的表面表明,就正似然比和诊断比值比而言,正电子发射断层扫描对宫颈癌的淋巴结转移具有相对较高的诊断价值。我们的发现表明,正电子发射断层扫描对宫颈癌患者的淋巴结转移可能具有相对较高的诊断价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号