首页> 外文期刊>Taiwanese journal of obstetrics and gynecology >Pathological discrepancy between colposcopic directed cervical biopsy and Loop Electrosurgical-Excision Procedures (LEEPs) in patients with biopsies proven high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
【24h】

Pathological discrepancy between colposcopic directed cervical biopsy and Loop Electrosurgical-Excision Procedures (LEEPs) in patients with biopsies proven high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

机译:经活检证实为高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的活检患者,阴道镜定向宫颈活检与环行电刀切除术(LEEP)之间的病理学差异

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective To determine the prevalence of patients with CIN1 or less from LEEP specimens in patients with colposcopic biopsy proven CIN2 or 3. Materials and methods This study was a retrospective–descriptive chart review. Clinical data were retrieved from medical records of women with CIN2 or 3 from colposcopic biopsy who subsequently underwent LEEP procedure between 2004 and 2014. All pathological slides were reviewed by the gynecologic pathologist. Statistical analyses were performed. Results Of 210 patients, 14 patients were excluded from the study. 196 patients were in eligible criteria and data were analyzed. There were 32 patients (16.3%) with CIN1 or less from LEEP specimens who previously had colposcopic biopsies proven CIN2 or 3. Only CIN2 from biopsy was the statistically significant risk factor of CIN1 or less in LEEP specimens. Odds ratio was 10.45 (95% confidence interval: 3.28–33.33, P ?
机译:目的确定经LEEP标本经阴道镜活检证实为CIN2或3的患者中CIN1或以下患者的患病率。材料与方法本研究是回顾性描述性图表审查。从阴道镜活检的CIN2或3的女性病历中检索出临床数据,这些女性随后在2004年至2014年间接受了LEEP手术。所有病理切片均由妇科病理学家检查。进行统计分析。结果在210名患者中,有14名患者被排除在研究之外。符合标准的196例患者进行了数据分析。 LEEP标本中CIN1或更少的32例患者(16.3%)以前经阴道镜活检证实为CIN2或3。只有活检中CIN2是LEEP标本中具有统计学意义的CIN1或以下的显着危险因素。赔率是10.45(95%置信区间:3.28-33.33,P <0.001)。结论先前经阴道镜活检证实为CIN2或3的LEEP标本中CIN1或以下的患者的患病率为16.3%。活检中的CIN2是LEEP标本中CIN1或以下的统计学显着危险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号