...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Educacao Fisica e Esporte >Gymnastics in higher education: reflections on assessment
【24h】

Gymnastics in higher education: reflections on assessment

机译:高等教育中的体操:对评估的思考

获取原文

摘要

Assessment procedures were based on the traditional educational paradigms of linearity and sequence, whose aim was to categorize and select individuals. With the advancement of Social and Human Sciences, assessments gained both a reflexive and an analytical characteristic and now they constitute a system of support and guidance for individual and group learning, all without losing sight of building character in the students. Supported by qualitative research, this study identified and discussed the assessments used by 14 university lecturers in the state of S?o Paulo who teach Gymnastics in the Physical Education undergraduate courses. The results showed different formats of assessment, namely: theoretical; debates; practical/experience; research; self-assessment and peer-review. None of the evaluated lecturers clearly stated the assessment criteria, becoming it, mainly, subjective. Four lecturers gave indication of using the assessment tools in the formative conception and only one lecturer guides its practice during the teaching-learning process after analyzing what has been detected in assessments.
机译:评估程序基于线性和顺序的传统教育范式,其目的是对个人进行分类和选择。随着社会科学和人文科学的进步,评估既具有反思性又具有分析性,现在已成为个人和团体学习的支持和指导系统,而这一切都不会忽视学生的性格培养。在定性研究的支持下,本研究确定并讨论了圣保罗州14名大学讲师在体育本科课程中教授体操的评估方法。结果显示了不同的评估形式,即:理论评估;辩论;实际/经验;研究;自我评估和同行评审。被评估的讲师中没有一个明确说明评估标准,而成为主要是主观的。四名讲师给出了在构想中使用评估工具的指示,只有一名讲师在分析评估中发现的内容后在教学过程中指导其实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号