...
首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine Reports >Utilization of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in patients diagnosed with diabetes: Analysis from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey
【24h】

Utilization of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in patients diagnosed with diabetes: Analysis from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

机译:血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)在诊断为糖尿病的患者中的使用:来自国家门诊医疗调查的分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective The objective of this study was to determine if a difference exists in the proportion of visits for the prescribing of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in diabetic patients during 2007–2010. Methods This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study included adults diagnosed with diabetes mellitus from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) during 2007–2010. Weighted chi-square tests and a multivariable logistic regression model were used to analyze associations between ACEI/ARB prescriptions and predictors of interest. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Results An unweighted total of 13,590 outpatient ambulatory care visits were identified for adult patients with diabetes without contraindications to ACEIs or ARBs in the NAMCS for the years studied. No statistically significant increase in the proportion of visits with an ACEI/ARB prescription was identified for years 2007–2010 (28.1% in 2007 to 32.2% in 2010). Females (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69- 0.89), patients 18–39 years old (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.43- 0.75), and Medicare users (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70- 0.94) were significantly less likely to receive an ACEI/ARB prescription. Patients with hypertension (OR 2.80, 95% CI 2.39-3.29), hyperlipidemia (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.22-1.65), and ischemic heart disease (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.10-1.70) were significantly more likely to receive an ACEI/ARB prescription. Conclusions Despite extensive evidence showing the benefits of ACEI/ARB medications in diabetic patients, disparities of treatment remain evident. Highlights ? Assessed ACEI/ARB prescriptions in diabetic patients for ADA guideline adherence ? A low percentage of patients prescribed an ACEI/ARB (28.1% in 2007–32.2% in 2010) ? Females, age 18–39, and Medicare users less likely to receive ACEI/ARB prescription ? Hypertension, hyperlipidemia and IHD: more likely to receive ACEI/ARB prescription ? Disparities in ACEI/ARB prescriptions remain evident.
机译:目的这项研究的目的是确定在2007-2010年间糖尿病患者处方血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的比例是否存在差异。方法这项回顾性,横断面,观察性研究纳入了2007-2010年美国国家门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)中诊断为患有糖尿病的成年人。加权卡方检验和多元Logistic回归模型用于分析ACEI / ARB处方与目标预测变量之间的关联。报告了赔率和95%置信区间。结果研究期间,在NAMCS中,没有成年ACEIs或ARB禁忌症的成年糖尿病患者共确定了13,590例门诊非门诊就诊。 2007年至2010年,使用ACEI / ARB处方的就诊比例没有统计学上的显着增加(2007年为28.1%,2010年为32.2%)。女性(OR 0.78,95%CI 0.69- 0.89),18-39岁患者(OR 0.56,95%CI 0.43- 0.75)和Medicare使用者(OR 0.81,95%CI 0.70- 0.94)的可能性大大降低收到ACEI / ARB处方。患有高血压(OR 2.80,95%CI 2.39-3.29),高脂血症(OR 1.42,95%CI 1.22-1.65)和缺血性心脏病(OR 1.36,95%CI 1.10-1.70)的患者更容易接受ACEI / ARB处方。结论尽管有大量证据显示ACEI / ARB药物对糖尿病患者有好处,但治疗差异仍然明显。强调 ?评估糖尿病患者的ACEI / ARB处方是否符合ADA指南?接受ACEI / ARB的患者比例很低(2007年为28.1%,2010年为32.2%)? 18-39岁的女性和Medicare使用者不太可能接受ACEI / ARB处方?高血压,高血脂和IHD:更有可能接受ACEI / ARB处方? ACEI / ARB处方中的差异仍然很明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号