...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Inpatient management of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Does choice of insulin regimen really matter?
【24h】

Inpatient management of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Does choice of insulin regimen really matter?

机译:2型糖尿病的住院治疗:胰岛素治疗方案的选择真的重要吗?

获取原文

摘要

Objective: To assess inpatient management of non-critically ill type 2 diabetics with different insulin regimen.Methods: We reviewed the medical records of all non-critically ill type 2 diabetic patients more than 18 years of age in medical department of civil hospital Karachi and Dow University of Health Sciences from January 2011 to December 2012. We collected the data from case records in data collection sheets that fulfill the inclusion criteria and divided the study subjects into three groups according to insulin regimen they received.Results: A total of 416 patients were analyzed out of which 220 were male. Subjects were divided into three groups according to insulin regimen they received. Majority were put on sliding scale of insulin (44.7%), while 33.1% and 22.1% subjects received basal bolus and pre-mixed insulin regimen respectively. Patients treated with basal bolus regimen had greater improvement in glycaemic control with short duration of hospital stay as compared to other two groups. The mean hyperglycaemic events were higher in sliding scale group while mean hypoglycaemic events were higher in basal bolus group.Conclusion: In non-critically ill type 2 diabetic patients the basal bolus regimen is superior to sliding and pre-mixed insulin regimen. Sliding scale should be discouraged in non-critically ill type 2 diabetic patients.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.304.4920How to cite this:Akhtar ST, Mahmood K, Naqvi IH, Vaswani AS. Inpatient management of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Does choice of insulin regimen really matter? Pak J Med Sci 2014;30(4):895-898. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.304.4920This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
机译:目的:评估采用不同胰岛素治疗方案的非危重2型糖尿病患者的住院治疗。方法:我们回顾了卡拉奇市民医院内科所有18岁以上非危重2型糖尿病患者的病历。陶氏健康科学大学从2011年1月至2012年12月。我们收集了符合入选标准的数据收集表中病例记录中的数据,并根据所接受的胰岛素治疗方案将研究对象分为三类。结果:总共416例患者分析了其中220位男性。根据他们接受的胰岛素治疗方案将受试者分为三组。多数患者的胰岛素滑动比例为(44.7%),而33.1%和22.1%的受试者分别接受了基础推注和预混合胰岛素治疗。与其他两组相比,接受基本推注方案治疗的患者在血糖控制方面的改善更大,住院时间更短。滑动量表组的平均高血糖事件较高,而基础推注组的平均低血糖事件较高。结论:在非重症2型糖尿病患者中,基础推注方案优于滑动和预混合胰岛素方案。在非重症2型糖尿病患者中,不建议使用滑尺。doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.304.4920如何引用此信息:Akhtar ST,Mahmood K,Naqvi IH,Vaswani AS。 2型糖尿病的住院治疗:胰岛素治疗方案的选择真的重要吗? Pak J Med Sci 2014; 30(4):895-898。 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.304.4920这是根据知识共享署名许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)的条款分发的开放访问文章,只要适当引用了原始作品,便可以在任何介质中不受限制地使用,分发和复制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号