首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review
【24h】

Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review

机译:寻找定性研究以纳入系统评价:结构化方法学评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Qualitative systematic reviews or qualitative evidence syntheses (QES) are increasingly recognised as a way to enhance the value of systematic reviews (SRs) of clinical trials. They can explain the mechanisms by which interventions, evaluated within trials, might achieve their effect. They can investigate differences in effects between different population groups. They can identify which outcomes are most important to patients, carers, health professionals and other stakeholders. QES can explore the impact of acceptance, feasibility, meaningfulness and implementation-related factors within a real world setting and thus contribute to the design and further refinement of future interventions. To produce valid, reliable and meaningful QES requires systematic identification of relevant qualitative evidence. Although the methodologies of QES, including methods for information retrieval, are well-documented, little empirical evidence exists to inform their conduct and reporting. Methods This structured methodological overview examines papers on searching for qualitative research identified from the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group Methodology Register and from citation searches of 15 key papers. Results A single reviewer reviewed 1299 references. Papers reporting methodological guidance, use of innovative methodologies or empirical studies of retrieval methods were categorised under eight topical headings: overviews and methodological guidance, sampling, sources, structured questions, search procedures, search strategies and filters, supplementary strategies and standards. Conclusions This structured overview presents a contemporaneous view of information retrieval for qualitative research and identifies a future research agenda. This review concludes that poor empirical evidence underpins current information practice in information retrieval of qualitative research. A trend towards improved transparency of search methods and further evaluation of key search procedures offers the prospect of rapid development of search methods.
机译:背景技术定性系统评价或定性证据合成(QES)被越来越多地认为是提高临床试验系统评价(SR)价值的一种方法。他们可以解释在试验中评估的干预措施可能达到其效果的机制。他们可以调查不同人群之间影响的差异。他们可以确定哪些结果对患者,护理人员,卫生专业人员和其他利益相关者最重要。 QES可以探索现实环境中接受,可行性,意义和与实施相关的因素的影响,从而有助于设计和进一步完善未来的干预措施。要产生有效,可靠和有意义的QES,需要系统地识别相关的定性证据。尽管QES的方法论(包括信息检索方法)已得到充分文献证明,但很少有经验证据可用来指导其行为和报告。方法本结构化方法论概述对从Cochrane定性和实施方法组方法论注册簿中鉴定的定性研究论文以及15篇关键论文的引文搜索进行了审查。结果一位审阅者审阅了1299篇文献。报告方法学指导,使用创新方法学或对检索方法进行实证研究的论文分为八个主题:概述和方法学指导,样本,来源,结构化问题,搜索程序,搜索策略和过滤器,补充策略和标准。结论本结构化概述提出了用于定性研究的信息检索的当代观点,并确定了未来的研究议程。这项审查得出结论认为,不良的经验证据为定性研究的信息检索提供了当前信息实践的基础。改进搜索方法的透明度并进一步评估关键搜索过程的趋势为搜索方法的快速发展提供了前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号