首页> 外文期刊>South African Journal of Communication Disorders >Literacy development of English language learners: The outcomes of an intervention programme in grade R
【24h】

Literacy development of English language learners: The outcomes of an intervention programme in grade R

机译:英语学习者的素养发展:R级干预计划的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

This study aims to contribute to the knowledge base on the status and development of emergent literacy skills of learners receiving formal education in their second or additional language. The focus is on young English language learners (ELLs), i.e. learners whose home language is not English but who have English as their language of teaching and learning. This article reports on a study that investigated ELLs’ emergent literacy skills prior to entering grade 1 and then evaluated the effectiveness of an evidence-based stimulation programme on early literacy skills in the South African context. Using a quasi-experimental design, ELLs’ emergent literacy skills were assessed with an adapted version of 8 of the subtests of the Emergent Literacy Assessment battery (Willenberg, 2004) and were compared to those of English first language (L1) and of ELL control groups, both before and after the 8-week purpose-designed programme. While learners showed significant improvement on 6 of the 8 subtests, the programme did not significantly improve ELLs’ skills in comparison to those of the control groups. Possible independent variables contributing to the dearth of intervention effect include socio-economic status, learners’ L1, and teacher- and classroom-specific characteristics, all of which were considered in this study. Clinical implications for speech-language therapists with regard to assessment, intervention, service delivery and outcome measures are highlighted.
机译:这项研究旨在为以第二语言或其他语言接受正规教育的学习者的新兴识字技能的状况和发展提供知识基础。重点是年轻的英语学习者(ELL),即母语不是英语但以英语为教学语言的学习者。本文报道了一项研究,该研究在进入1年级之前调查了ELLs的新兴识字技能,然后评估了在南非背景下基于证据的早期识字技能刺激计划的有效性。使用准实验设计,通过改编的8个紧急扫盲评估子测试(Willenberg,2004年)对ELL的新兴识字技能进行了评估,并将其与英语为母语的英语(L1)和ELL对照的进行了比较。小组,在为期8周的专门设计的计划之前和之后。虽然学习者在8个子测验中的6个显示出明显的进步,但与对照组相比,该计划并未显着提高ELL的技能。可能会导致缺乏干预效果的独立变量包括社会经济地位,学习者的L1以及教师和教室的特定特征,所有这些因素均在本研究中进行了考虑。强调了言语治疗师在评估,干预,服务提供和结果测量方面的临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号