首页> 外文期刊>South African medical journal = >Is it time for South Africa to end the routine high-dose vitamin A supplementation programme?
【24h】

Is it time for South Africa to end the routine high-dose vitamin A supplementation programme?

机译:南非现在该结束常规的大剂量维生素A补充计划了吗?

获取原文
       

摘要

In accordance with World Health Organization guidelines, South Africa (SA) introduced routine periodic high-dose vitamin A supplementation (VAS) in 2002. These guidelines were developed after research in the 1980s and 1990s showed the efficacy of VAS in reducing childhood mortality. However, two recent studies in low- to middle-income countries (2013 and 2014) have shown no effect of high-dose VAS on mortality. Additionally, there is no clear research evidence that 6-monthly doses of vitamin A result in a sustained shift in serum retinol levels or reduce subclinical vitamin A deficiency. These two points should encourage SA to re-examine the validity of these guidelines. A long-term view of what is in the best interests of the majority of the people is needed. The short-term intervention of administering vitamin A capsules not only fails to improve serum retinol levels but may create dependence on a 'technical fix' to address the fundamental problem of poor nutrition, which is ultimately underpinned by poverty. It may also cause harm. Although there are those, some with vested interests, who will argue for continuation of the routine high-dose VAS programmes, SA policymakers and scientists need to evaluate the facts and be prepared to rethink this policy. There is cause for optimism: SA's health policymakers have previously taken bold stands on the basis of evidence. The examples of regulation of tobacco products and taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages, ending the free distribution of formula milk for HIV-positive mothers and legislating against the marketing of breastmilk substitutes provide precedents. Here is a time yet again for decision-makers to make bold choices in the interests of the people of SA. While the cleanest choice would be national discontinuation of the routine VAS programme, there may be other possibilities, such as first stopping the programme in Northern Cape Province (where there is clear evidence of hypervitaminosis A), followed by the other provinces in time.
机译:根据世界卫生组织的指导方针,南非(SA)在2002年引入了常规的定期高剂量维生素A补充剂(VAS)。这些指导方针是在1980年代和1990年代的研究表明VAS降低儿童死亡率的功效后制定的。但是,最近在中低收入国家(2013年和2014年)进行的两项研究表明,大剂量VAS对死亡率没有影响。此外,没有明确的研究证据表明,每月服用6个月的维生素A会导致血清视黄醇水平持续变化或减少亚临床维生素A缺乏症。这两点应鼓励SA重新检查这些准则的有效性。需要长远来看什么才是大多数人的最大利益。服用维生素A胶囊的短期干预措施不仅不能提高血清视黄醇水平,而且可能导致对“技术手段”的依赖,以解决营养不良这一根本问题,而营养不良最终是由贫困造成的。也可能造成伤害。尽管有一些人有既得利益,他们会主张继续执行常规的高剂量增值服务计划,但SA政策制定者和科学家需要评估事实,并准备重新考虑这项政策。有理由感到乐观:南非的卫生政策制定者以前根据证据采取了大胆的立场。烟草制品监管和含糖饮料税收的例子,结束了向艾滋病毒呈阳性的母亲免费分发配方奶,以及禁止母乳代用品销售的立法,这些都是先例。现在是决策者再次为SA人民的利益做出大胆选择的时候了。尽管最明智的选择是在全国范围内停止常规VAS计划,但可能还有其他可能性,例如首先在北开普省(那里有明显的维生素A增高迹象)停止该计划,然后再其他省份及时出台。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号