首页> 外文期刊>Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia >Is sealing cuff pressure, easy, reliable and safe technique for endotracheal tube cuff inflation?: A comparative study
【24h】

Is sealing cuff pressure, easy, reliable and safe technique for endotracheal tube cuff inflation?: A comparative study

机译:密封套囊压力,气管导管套囊充气是否简便,可靠,安全的技术?

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To compare the three common methods of endotracheal tube cuff inflation (sealing pressure, precise standard pressure or finger estimation) regarding the effective tracheal seal and the incidence of post-intubation airway complications. Methods: Seventy-five adult patients scheduled for N2 O free general anesthesia were enrolled in this study. After induction of anesthesia, endotracheal tubes size 7.5 mm for female and 8.0 mm for male were used. Patients were randomly assigned into one of three groups. Control group ( n =25), the cuff was inflated to a pressure of 25 cm H2O; sealing group ( n =25), the cuff was inflated to prevent air leaks at airway pressure of 20 cm H2O and finger group ( n =25), the cuff was inflated using finger estimation. Tracheal leaks, incidence of sore throat, hoarseness and dysphagia were tested. Results: Although cuff pressure was significantly low in the sealing group compared to the control group ( P 2O, free anesthesia sealing cuff pressure is an easy, undemanding and safe alternative to the standard technique, regarding effective sealing and low incidence of sore throat.
机译:目的:比较有效气管密封和气管插管后并发症发生率的三种常见气管插管充气方法(密封压力,精确标准压力或手指估计)。方法:本研究纳入了75名接受N 2 O全身麻醉的成人患者。麻醉后,使用气管插管,雌性7.5 mm,雄性8.0 mm。将患者随机分为三组之一。对照组(n = 25),将袖带充气至25 cm H 2 O;密封组(n = 25),将袖带充气以防止在气道压力为20 cm H 2 O时漏气;手指组(n = 25),使用手指估计对袖带充气。测试气管渗漏,喉咙痛,声音嘶哑和吞咽困难。结果:尽管与对照组相比,密封组的袖带压明显较低(P 2 O,但就有效的密封性和低发生率而言,自由麻醉的密封袖带压是标准技术的一种简便,要求不高且安全的替代方法喉咙痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号