首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >Achieving a Safe Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in the Prehospital Setting: Is It Time to Revise the Standard Cuff Inflation Practice?
【24h】

Achieving a Safe Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in the Prehospital Setting: Is It Time to Revise the Standard Cuff Inflation Practice?

机译:在预孢子环境中实现安全的气管内管袖带压力:是时候修改标准袖带通胀实践了?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Numerous studies have reported unsafe endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressures (CP) in the prehospital environment. The purpose of this study was to identify an optimal cuff inflation volume (CIV) to achieve a safe CP (20-30 cmH(2)O). This observational study utilized 30 recently harvested ovine tracheae, which were warmed from refrigeration in a water bath at 85 degrees F prior to testing. Each trachea was intubated with five different ETT sizes (6.0-8.0mm), and each size tube was tested with six cuff inflation volumes (5-10 cc). The order of ETT size for each trachea and CIV for each size ETT was randomly pre-assigned. Data were descriptively summarized and categorized before mixed-effects logistic regression was used to determine optimal CIV. Only 113 CP measurements (12.6%, N = 900) were within the optimal range (M = 54.75 cmH(2)O, SD = 38.52), all of which resulted from a CIV 6 or 7 cc (61% and 39%, respectively). CIVs of 5 cc (n = 150) resulted in underinflation (<20 cmH(2)O) in all instances, while CIVs of 8, 9, or 10 cc (n = 150 each) resulted in overinflation (>30 cmH(2)O) in all instances, regardless of ETT size. The odds of achieving a safe CP were greater with CIV of 6 cc for tube sizes 6.0 (OR = 15.9, 95% CI = 3.85-65.58, p < 0.01) and 6.5mm (OR = 3.16, 95% CI = 1.06-9.39, p = 0.039); however, there was no significant difference in the odds of achieving a safe CP between CIV of 6 and 7 cc for tube sizes 7.0, 7.5, or 8.0mm. Neither trachea circumference (M = 7.11cm, SD = 0.40), nor tissue temperature (M = 81.32 degrees F, SD = 0.93) were found to be significant predictors of CP (p = 0.20 and 0.81, respectively). Our study showed a high frequency of CP measurements outside of the desired norms. The CIV range of 6-7 cc resulted in the highest likelihood of achieving the desired cuff pressure range, while cuffs inflated with 8-10 cc resulted in dangerously high CPs in all instances. In the absence of a more ideal solution, the results of this study suggest that narrowing the recommended CIV from 5-10 cc to 6-7 cc might be a reasonable target for any tube size.
机译:许多研究报告了在前环境中的不安全的气管管(ETT)袖口压力(CP)。本研究的目的是识别最佳的袖带通胀量(CIV)以实现安全CP(20-30cmH(2)o)。该观察性研究利用了30次最近收获的绵羊硬化,在测试之前在85℃下在水浴中的制冷中加热。每次气管都有五种不同的ETT尺寸(6.0-8.0mm),并用六个袖带通胀量(5-10cc)进行测试。随机预先分配了每个尺寸的每个气管和Civ的ETT大小的顺序。在使用混合效应逻辑回归以确定最佳文明之前,描述了数据被描述和分类。只有113个CP测量(12.6%,n = 900)在最佳范围内(m = 54.75cmh(2)o,sd = 38.52),所有这些都由文明6或7 cc(61%和39%)产生(61%,分别)。 5 cc(n = 150)的文明导致所有情况下出来(<20 cmH(2)o),而8,9或10 cc(n = 150)的Civs导致过载(> 30 cmh(2 )o)在所有情况下,无论ETT大小如何。对于管尺寸为6.0(或= 15.9,95%CI = 3.85-65.58,P <0.01)和6.5mm(或= 3.16,95%Ci = 1.06-9.39 ,p = 0.039);然而,在图3.0,7.5或8.0mm的6和7 CC之间实现安全CP的可能性没有显着差异。对于CP(P = 0.20和0.81),发现气管周长(m = 7.11cm,sd = 0.40)或组织温度(m = 81.32°F,sd = 0.93)是显着的预测因子(分别为0.20和0.81)。我们的研究表明,在所需规范之外的高频率为CP测量。公路范围为6-7 CC,导致实现所需的袖带压力范围的最高可能性,而用8-10cc膨胀的袖口导致所有情况下的危险高CPS。在没有更理想的解决方案的情况下,该研究的结果表明,从5-10CC到6-7 CC的推荐文明可能是任何管尺寸的合理目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号