首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing >Assessing the correct inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff: a larger pilot balloon increases the sensitivity of the 'finger-pressure' technique, but it remains poorly reliable in clinical practice
【24h】

Assessing the correct inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff: a larger pilot balloon increases the sensitivity of the 'finger-pressure' technique, but it remains poorly reliable in clinical practice

机译:评估气管管袖口的正确膨胀:更大的先导气球增加了“手指压力”技术的灵敏度,但在临床实践中仍然可靠

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The pilot balloon palpation (or finger-pressure') method is still widely used to assess the endotracheal tube cuff inflation, despite consistent evidence of its poor sensitivity in recognizing cuff overinflation. It was recently speculated that this may be related to the lower wall tension (due to the smaller radius) of the pilot balloon as compared with the cuff, according to Laplace's law. To verify this hypothesis and, secondarily, to assess whether the use of a large' pilot balloon (identical to the cuff) increases the reliability of this technique, 62 anesthetists (41 experienced anesthesiologists and 21 residents) were asked to estimate the pressure of a cuff inflated to 88mmHg into a simulated trachea by feeling both a usual and a modified large' pilot balloon. A similar test was repeated at 40mmHg. After palpation of the usual pilot balloon, only 35% of participants (49% of experienced anesthesiologists and 10% of residents) recognized considerable overinflation (88mmHg), as compared with 87% of participants (95% of experienced anesthesiologists and 71% of residents) after palpation of the large' pilot balloon. Moreover, 89% of participants (85% of experienced anesthesiologists and 95% of residents) believed that pressure was higher in the large' balloon than in the normal one. However, only 32% of participants (51% of experienced anesthesiologists and none of residents) recognized slight overinflation (40mmHg) after feeling the large' balloon. The pilot balloon size affects the sensitivity of the finger-pressure' technique, but it remains poorly reliable with a larger pilot balloon.
机译:尽管其令人难度的敏感性令人难度的令人难度的越来越令人难度的敏感性,但仍被广泛用于评估气管内管箍通胀的飞行员气囊触控方法。根据Laplace的定律,据推测,与袖口相比,这可能与先导气囊的下壁张力(由于较小的半径)有关。为了验证这一假设,其次是评估是否使用大型“先导气球(与袖口相同)的使用增加了这种技术的可靠性,62名麻醉师(41位经历了41名经历过的麻醉学家和21名居民)估计了一个压力通过感觉通常和改进的大型'试点气球,袖带膨胀成88mmHg进入模拟气管。在40mmHg中重复类似的测试。在触诊通常的先导气球之后,只有35%的参与者(49%的经验丰富的麻醉学家和10%的居民)认可了相当的过度 - 与87%的参与者(95%有经验的麻醉学家和71%的居民)相比)在触诊大型的“飞行员气球”之后。此外,89%的参与者(85%的经验丰富的麻醉师和95%的居民)认为,大的“气球中的压力比正常的压力更高。然而,只有32%的参与者(51%的经验丰富的麻醉师和居民)在感受到大的“气球”后略微过度下降(40mmHg)。先导气球尺寸会影响手指压力的技术的灵敏度,但较大的先导气球仍然可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号