...
首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Evaluating the Knowledge of Endotracheal Cuff Pressure Monitoring Among Critical Care Providers by Palpation of Pilot Balloon and By Endotracheal Tube Cuff Manometer
【24h】

Evaluating the Knowledge of Endotracheal Cuff Pressure Monitoring Among Critical Care Providers by Palpation of Pilot Balloon and By Endotracheal Tube Cuff Manometer

机译:通过触诊试验气球和气管内管袖口压力计来评估关键护理提供者的内伤袖带压力监测的知识

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Mishandled endotracheal cuff pressure may either make ventilation difficult or cause damage to the airway. Therefore, the aim of this audit was to assess the knowledge about endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring with a manometer and manual palpation of pilot balloon among critical care providers. Methods This audit includes 150 critical care providers having experience of handling endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff at critical care area of National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi from April 2017 to June 2017. Knowledge about endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring with the manometer and deleterious effects of mishandled ETT cuff was assessed using a self-reported questionnaire. Enrolled healthcare providers were asked to palpate the patient and cuff pressure was recorded and categorized. Results Out of 150 participants, 66 (44.0%) were doctors. Only 46 (30.67%) participants had prior knowledge about ETT cuff manometer and 110 (73.33%) had never used a manometer. Similarly only 42 (28.0%) had knowledge of hazardous effects of mishandled ETT cuff. Kappa coefficient of 0.155 with p=0.015 showed significant yet low agreement between participant prediction and the actual amount of air in cuff balloon. Agreement level was comparatively higher for staff as compared to doctors with a Kappa coefficient of 0.210 (p=0.018) vs. 0.133 (p=0.099). Conclusion In this study of knowledge and practice of ETT tube cuff pressure monitoring, we observed low levels of knowledge (30.67%), poor adherence to standard practice (73.33%) and were able to demonstrate poor agreement (Kappa coefficient?0.155; p=0.015) between the palpation method and cuff manometer measurements for assessing cuff pressure.
机译:引入误操作的气管袖带压力可以使通风难以造成通风或对气道造成损坏。因此,本审计的目的是评估对压力计的压力计和手动触摸临时运动员在关键护理提供者中的引导气球的知识。方法,该审计包括150例关键护理提供者,其中包括在2017年4月至2017年6月到2017年6月在国家心血管疾病(Nicvd),卡拉奇的关键护理区域处理内部外伤管(ETT)袖口的经验。关于压力计和压力计的知识与压力计和压力计利用自我报告的问卷评估了Mishandandled Ett Cuff的有害影响。要求注册的医疗保健提供者触诊患者,并记录袖带压力并分类。 150名参与者的结果为66名(44.0%)是医生。只有46名(30.67%)参与者有关于ETT袖口尺,110(73.33%)从未使用过压力计。同样,只有42(28.0%)对Mishandandled的欧特袖口有危险作用。 kappa系数为0.155,p = 0.015显示参与者预测与袖带气球中的实际空气量之间的显着且低于一致性。与Kappa系数为0.210的医生相比,员工的协议水平相对较高(p = 0.018)与0.133(p = 0.099)。结论在欧特管袖口压力监测的知识和实践研究中,我们观察到低程度的知识(30.67%),遵守标准实践的较差(73.33%)并且能够展示差的协议(κ系数?0.155; P = 0.015)在触发方法和袖带压力计测量之间进行评估,用于评估袖带压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号