【24h】

Teaching evaluations & the tyranny of numbers

机译:教学评估与数字暴政

获取原文
       

摘要

I read with interest, and some concern, the article by Sylvia HuntleyMoore and John Panter in the first issue of Overview: "Evaluating Teaching at the University ofWollongong" (Vol. 1. No.1, 1993). The authors were careful to point out differences between 'diagnostic' and 'assessment' evaluations, with only the latter evaluations to be used in promotion or appraisal processes. The use of the 'assessment' evaluations as evidence of teaching quality, not only in promotion or appraisal processes, but also in academic staff selection committees, is the issue I wish to address here.
机译:我饶有兴致地读了西尔维亚·亨特利·摩尔(Sylvia HuntleyMoore)和约翰·潘特(John Panter)在《概述》第一期中的文章:“卧龙岗大学的教学评估”(第1卷,1993年第1期)。作者谨慎指出“诊断”和“评估”评估之间的差异,只有后者评估可用于晋升或评估过程。我想在这里解决这个问题,不仅在晋升或评估过程中,而且在学术人员选拔委员会中,都使用“评估”评估作为教学质量的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号