...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Single-Dose Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Patellofemoral Chondromalacia
【24h】

Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Single-Dose Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Patellofemoral Chondromalacia

机译:单剂量透明质酸治疗Pat股软骨软化症疗效的前瞻性,随机,双盲评估

获取原文

摘要

Background: Patellofemoral pain is common in the young and active populations. Nonoperative management is limited and focuses on physical therapy. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is an injectable device that has been used for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Hypothesis: A single injection of HA would reduce pain and improve function in patients with patellofemoral pain who had previously failed conservative management. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 86 patients with patellofemoral pain (65 females, 21 males; mean ± SD age, 27.0 ± 7.7 years; height, 168.6 ± 8.9 cm; weight, 74.6 ± 17.0 kg; body mass index, 26.2 ± 5.2 kg/m ~(2)) enrolled in this study after failing conservative management. Patients were randomly allocated to either 6 mL of HA or a sham injection. All patients were prescribed an additional home exercise program, including lower extremity strengthening and flexibility exercises, and were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months. Outcome assessments included patellofemoral pain assessment with a visual analog scale during a single-legged squat, KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), Kujala score, Tegner activity rating, and normalized isometric knee extension strength. Group assignment was revealed after the 6-month assessment, and crossover treatment was offered to patients in the sham group who were still symptomatic. Linear mixed models were used to compare outcomes between groups and across time. Results: A total of 45 patients were randomized to HA injection and 41 to sham, with 6 patients lost to follow-up (93% follow-up rate). Patients in both groups experienced a significant reduction in visual analog pain ratings and significant improvements in all domains of the KOOS and in Kujala scores at 6 months when compared with baseline measurement ( P & .05); however, there was no significant difference between groups. There were no differences observed over time or between groups for normalized knee extension strength or Tegner activity rating ( P & .05). Conclusion: HA injection had no clinically meaningful effect on pain or functional outcomes in patients diagnosed with patellofemoral pain. Improvements were observed for both groups in patient-reported pain and function, with no change in quadriceps strength or activity rating. Registration: NCT01771952 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
机译:背景:Pat股骨疼痛在年轻和活跃人群中很常见。非手术治疗受到限制,并且侧重于物理治疗。透明质酸(HA)是一种可注射的装置,已用于治疗膝盖骨关节炎。假设:单次注射HA可以减轻以前保守治疗失败的pa股疼痛患者的疼痛并改善其功能。研究设计:随机对照试验;证据等级,2级。方法:共有86例pa股痛患者(65例女性,21例男性;平均±SD年龄,27.0±7.7岁;身高,168.6±8.9 cm;体重,74.6±17.0 kg;体重指数(26.2±5.2 kg / m〜(2))在保守治疗失败后参加了这项研究。将患者随机分配至6 mL HA或假注射。为所有患者开出了额外的家庭锻炼计划,包括下肢加强锻炼和柔韧性锻炼,并在1、3和6个月进行了评估。结果评估包括单腿下蹲时用视觉模拟量表评估pa股股骨疼痛,KOOS(膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分),Kujala评分,Tegner活动评分以及标准化的等距膝盖伸展力量。经过6个月的评估后,发现了小组分配,并且对仍然有症状的假手术组患者提供了交叉治疗。线性混合模型用于比较组之间以及跨时间的结果。结果:总共有45例患者被随机分配到HA注射组中,有41例进行了假手术,其中6例失去了随访(93%的随访率)。与基线测量相比,两组患者在6​​个月时的视觉模拟疼痛评分均明显降低,并且在KOOS的所有方面和Kujala评分方面均得到了显着改善(P <.05);但是,各组之间没有显着差异。随时间推移或各组之间没有观察到标准化的膝盖伸展力量或Tegner活性评分的差异(P≥0.05)。结论:HA注射对诊断为pa股疼痛的患者的疼痛或功能结局无临床意义的影响。两组患者报告的疼痛和功能均得到改善,但股四头肌的强度或活动度没有变化。注册:NCT01771952(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号