首页> 外文期刊>Clinical journal of sport medicine: official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine >Efficacy of Intra-Articular Polynucleotides Associated With Hyaluronic Acid Versus Hyaluronic Acid Alone in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial
【24h】

Efficacy of Intra-Articular Polynucleotides Associated With Hyaluronic Acid Versus Hyaluronic Acid Alone in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial

机译:与透明质酸相关的关节内多核苷酸与透明质酸单独治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效:随机,双盲,受控临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: Pain and range of motion loss are the main clinical features of osteoarthritis (OA). Hyaluronic acid (HA) is one of the infiltrative therapies for OA treatment; however, its effectiveness is a matter of an ongoing debate in clinical practice. Polynucleotides (PNs), a DNA-derived macromolecule with natural origin and trophic activity, were found to favor cell growth and collagen production, in preclinical and clinical studies regarding cartilage regeneration. This study aimed at evaluating whether injection of PNs, in combination with HA [PNs associated with HA (PNHA)], can ameliorate pain and function of knees affected by OA, more than HA alone. Design: A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Patients: The study enrolled 100 patients, then randomized to receive PNHA or HA alone (3 weekly knee I.A. injections). Interventions and Main Outcome Measures: Pain reduction, decrease of proinflammatory synovial fluid (SF) factors, and improvement in knee function were evaluated by Knee Society Score and WOMAC scores, after 2, 6, and 12 months and by biochemical and immunoenzymatic analyses of SF at the end of the treatment. Results: Knee Society Score total score and pain item significantly ameliorated in both groups, showing better results in PNHA- than in the HA-treated group. A significant reduction in the WOMAC score was observed over time for both groups. No significant adverse events were reported in either group. Conclusions: These findings suggest that I.A. injection of PNs, in combination with HA, is more effective in improving knee function and pain, in a joint affected by OA, compared with HA alone.
机译:目的:疼痛和运动范围是骨关节炎(OA)的主要临床特征。透明质酸(HA)是OA治疗的渗透疗法之一;然而,其有效性是临床实践中正在进行的辩论问题。多核苷酸(PNS)是一种具有天然来源和营养活性的DNA衍生的大分子,有利于关于软骨再生的临床前和临床研究中的细胞生长和胶原蛋白。该研究旨在评估是否与HA [与HA(PNHA)相关的HA [PNS]的注射,可以改善受OA影响的膝关节的疼痛和功能,仅仅是HA。设计:随机,双盲,受控临床试验。患者:该研究招收了100名患者,然后随机接受PNHA或HA单独(3每周膝关节。注射)。干预和主要观察措施:通过膝关节协会得分和Womac评分,在2,6和12个月后以及SF的生化和免疫酶分析后,通过膝关节社会评分和Womac分数评估疼痛减少,降低促炎症滑液(SF)因子,以及膝关节的改善,并通过生物化学和免疫酶分析SF的生化和免疫酶分析在治疗结束时。结果:膝关节协会评分总分和疼痛物品在两组中显着改善,表现出比HA治疗组的效果更好。对于这两个群体随着时间的推移,观察WOWAC评分的显着减少。任何一组都没有报告显着的不良事件。结论:这些研究结果表明我是。与HA单独相比,与HA组合注射PNS,更有效地改善受OA影响的膝关节和疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号