首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Hyperflexion and Femoral Interference Screw Insertion in ACL Reconstruction
【24h】

Hyperflexion and Femoral Interference Screw Insertion in ACL Reconstruction

机译:ACL重建中的超屈曲和股骨干螺钉插入

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: In anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions produced with flexible reamers and no knee hyperflexion, it is unknown whether knee hyperflexion is necessary for femoral interference screw insertion. Purpose: To compare femoral screw-graft divergence in anatomic ACL reconstructions with endoscopic interference screws placed without knee hyperflexion and with the use of flexible versus rigid screwdrivers. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten matched pairs of cadaveric knees had bone-tendon-bone graft ACL reconstructions with anatomic femoral tunnels. The knees were flexed to 90°. Femoral interference screws (7 × 20 mm) were placed in pairs of knees: in 1 knee with a flexible screwdriver and in the opposite knee with a rigid screwdriver. Graft-screw divergence was imaged with computed tomography scans and tested with cyclic and static biomechanical tests. Results: The mean screw-graft divergence was 12.07° ± 4.04° with the rigid screwdriver and 10.68° ± 3.23° with the flexible screwdriver ( P = .35). The cyclic tests with screws placed by a rigid screwdriver had a mean increase in displacement of 0.56 ± 0.20 mm. For screws placed with the flexible screwdriver, the mean increase in displacement was 0.58 ± 0.32 mm ( P = .66). Yield load was 393.3 ± 95.1 N for screws placed by a rigid screwdriver and 408.2 ± 119.0 N for screws inserted with the flexible screwdriver ( P = .78). Maximum load was 523.1 ± 88.7 N for screws placed by a rigid screwdriver and 467.1 ± 107.3 N for screws inserted with the flexible screwdriver ( P = .09). Conclusion: With either a rigid or a flexible screwdriver, there were no significant effects on screw divergence or fixation strength. Clinical Relevance: Knees can be kept at 90° during endoscopic femoral interference screw insertion. The use of a traditional rigid or flexible screwdriver will not affect screw-graft divergence or fixation strength.
机译:背景:在使用柔性铰刀且无膝关节过度屈曲产生的解剖学上的前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中,未知是否需要股骨干螺钉插入时需要进行膝关节过度屈曲。目的:比较解剖型ACL重建中股骨螺钉植入物的散度与无膝盖超屈的内窥镜干涉螺钉以及使用柔性螺丝刀与刚性螺丝刀的比较。研究设计:受控实验室研究。方法:十对配对的尸体膝盖经过解剖性股骨隧道重建骨-腱-骨移植ACL。膝盖弯曲到90°。成对的干涉螺钉(7×20 mm)成对放置在膝盖中:使用柔性螺丝刀在1个膝盖中,使用刚性螺丝刀在相反的膝盖中。嫁接螺杆的发散度用计算机断层扫描成像,并通过循环和静态生物力学测试进行测试。结果:刚性螺丝刀的平均螺丝接缝散度为12.07°±4.04°,而柔性螺丝刀的平均螺丝接缝发散角为10.68°±3.23°(P = .35)。用刚性螺丝刀放置的螺丝进行的循环测试平均位移增加了0.56±0.20 mm。对于使用柔性螺丝刀放置的螺钉,位移的平均增加值为0.58±0.32 mm(P = .66)。用刚性螺丝刀放置的螺钉的屈服载荷为393.3±95.1 N,使用柔性螺丝刀插入的螺钉的屈服载荷为408.2±119.0 N(P = .78)。用刚性螺丝刀放置的螺钉的最大负载为523.1±88.7 N,使用柔性螺丝刀插入的螺钉的最大负载为467.1±107.3 N(P = .09)。结论:无论使用刚性螺丝刀还是柔性螺丝刀,都不会对螺钉的发散或固定强度产生重大影响。临床意义:内窥镜股骨干螺钉插入过程中,膝盖可以保持90°。使用传统的刚性或柔性螺丝起子不会影响螺钉接缝的发散或固定强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号