...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Alimentos >Comparative study of total lipids extraction methods in vegetable and animal samples
【24h】

Comparative study of total lipids extraction methods in vegetable and animal samples

机译:植物和动物样品中总脂质提取方法的比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In recent years several researchers have conducted studies comparing total lipids extraction methods, to find the most efficient method. The objective of this work was to study four different total lipids extraction methods in soybean crumbs and chicken thigh hillbilly with solvents of different degrees of toxicity and polarity (n-hexane, n-hexane-isopropanol, chloroform, methanol and ethanol). The study showed that the Soxhlet method, using ethanol as solvent was more efficient in the total lipids extraction present in soybean crumbs (5.38%), but not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) for organic chicken thigh (3.35%), among the methods. The Bligh & Dyer cold method was the most efficient for the soybean crumbs.   DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14685/rebrapa.v1i2.19
机译:近年来,一些研究人员进行了比较总脂质提取方法的研究,以找到最有效的方法。这项工作的目的是研究使用不同毒性和极性(正己烷,正己烷-异丙醇,氯仿,甲醇和乙醇)的溶剂,在乡郊大豆粉和鸡大腿中研究四种不同的总脂质提取方法。研究表明,以乙醇为溶剂的索氏提取法在提取大豆屑中的总脂质方面更为有效(5.38%),但在有机鸡大腿(3.35%)中无显着差异(p≤ 0.05)。方法。布莱&代尔冷法对大豆屑最有效。   DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.14685/rebrapa.v1i2.19

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号