首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation – an intraindividual comparison
【24h】

Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation – an intraindividual comparison

机译:哪种放射技术对局部晚期宫颈癌患者最有益?强度调制的质子治疗与强度调制的光子治疗,螺旋层析疗法和容积弧光疗法用于一次辐射的比较–个体内比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background To compare highly sophisticated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivered by either helical tomotherapy (HT), RapidArc (RA), IMRT with protons (IMPT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods and materials Twenty cervical cancer patients were irradiated using either conventional IMRT, VMAT or HT; ten received pelvic (PEL) and ten extended field irradiation (EFRT). The dose to the planning-target volume A (PTV_A: cervix, uterus, pelvic?±?para-aortic lymph nodes) was 1.8/50.4 Gy. The SIB dose for the parametrium (PTV_B), was 2.12/59.36 Gy. MRI-guided brachytherapy was administered with 5 fractions up to 25 Gy. For EBRT, the lower target constraints were 95% of the prescribed dose in 95% of the target volume. The irradiated small bowel (SB) volumes were kept as low as possible. For every patient, target parameters as well as doses to the organs at risk (SB, bladder, rectum) were evaluated intra-individually for IMRT, HT, VMAT and IMPT. Results All techniques provided excellent target volume coverage, homogeneity, conformity. With IMPT, there was a significant reduction of the mean dose (Dmean) of the SB from 30.2?±?4.0 Gy (IMRT); 27.6?±?5.6 Gy (HT); 34.1?±?7.0 (RA) to 18.6?±?5.9 Gy (IMPT) for pelvic radiation and 26.3?±?3.2 Gy (IMRT); 24.0?±?4.1 (HT); 25.3?±?3.7 (RA) to 13.8?±?2.8 Gy (IMPT) for patients with EFRT, which corresponds to a reduction of 38-52% for the Dmean (SB). Futhermore, the low dose bath (V10Gy) to the small bowel was reduced by 50% with IMPT in comparison to all photon techniques. Furthermore, Dmean to the bladder and rectum was decresed by 7-9 Gy with IMPT in patents with pelvic radiation and EFRT. Conclusion All modern techniques (were proved to be dosimetrically adequate regarding coverage, conformity and homogeneity of the target. Protons offered the best sparing of small bowel and rectum and therefore could contribute to a significant reduction of acute and late toxicity in cervical cancer treatment.
机译:背景为了比较局部晚期宫颈癌患者通过螺旋断层扫描(HT),RapidArc(RA),IMRT与质子(IMPT)进行的高度精密的调强放射治疗(IMRT)。方法和材料采用常规IMRT,VMAT或HT对20例宫颈癌患者进行辐照。十名接受了骨盆(PEL),十名接受了野外照射(EFRT)。计划目标体积A(PTV_A:宫颈,子宫,盆腔±主动脉旁淋巴结)的剂量为1.8 / 50.4 Gy。子宫内膜的SIB剂量(PTV_B)为2.12 / 59.36 Gy。 MRI引导的近距离放射治疗以5级(最高25 Gy)的剂量给药。对于EBRT,较低的目标限制是目标体积的95%中规定剂量的95%。照射后的小肠(SB)量应尽可能低。对于每位患者,分别针对IMRT,HT,VMAT和IMPT分别评估目标参数以及处于危险中的器官(SB,膀胱,直肠)的剂量。结果所有技术均提供了出色的目标体积覆盖率,同质性和一致性。使用IMPT后,SB的平均剂量(D )从30.2?±?4.0 Gy(IMRT)显着降低; 27.6±±5.6Gy(HT);骨盆辐射为34.1±±7.0 Gy(IMPT)至18.6±±5.9 Gy(IMPT); 26.3±±3.2 Gy(IMRT); 24.0±±4.1(HT); EFRT患者为25.3±±3.7(RA)至13.8±±2.8 Gy(IMPT),相当于D (SB)降低38-52%。此外,与所有光子技术相比,IMPT可以使小肠的低剂量沐浴(V 10Gy )减少50%。此外,在盆腔辐射和EFRT专利中,使用IMPT使膀胱和直肠的D mean 降低7-9 Gy。结论所有现代技术(在靶标的覆盖范围,一致性和均一性方面都被证明在剂量学上是足够的。质子对小肠和直肠的保留效果最佳,因此可以大大降低宫颈癌的急性和晚期毒性)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号