首页> 外文期刊>Research on Humanities and Social Sciences >Governance in Higher Education: A Comparative Study on Ghana and China
【24h】

Governance in Higher Education: A Comparative Study on Ghana and China

机译:高等教育的治理:加纳与中国的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Governance in higher education is one key concern for policy makers on restructuring the higher educational systems all over the world. The concepts of higher education governance often bring conflict between institutions and politicians on issues concerning institutional management. This study examined the concepts of higher education governance based on a comparative study of china and Ghana. The study gave special attention to various reforms on governance, higher education autonomy, funding, higher education law and structure of decision making in both countries. This paper argued that, if government limits its influence on higher education governance and higher education institutions are given a significant level of autonomy to make decision on academic program development and appointment of key positions, it will enable the higher education leaders use their expertise to develop high quality higher education. However, it’s worth mentioning that, this paper does not argue for governmental absence on higher education governance and management; government will continue with policy formulation on higher education. The comparative study is adopted because, china’s higher education has attracted many students from developing countries in Africa and Asia and Ghana as an African country has over ten thousand students pursuing programs at all levels. Higher institutions in Ghana in the past decade have enjoyed good academic relationship with Chinese institutions. Ghana as a middle-income country in the quest to build high quality higher education can learn from the Chinese system. This study will also contribute to literatures in educational governance.
机译:高等教育的治理是决策者在全球范围内重组高等教育系统的关键问题之一。高等教育治理的概念常常在机构管理方面引起机构与政治家之间的冲突。这项研究基于对中国和加纳的比较研究,考察了高等教育治理的概念。该研究特别关注两国的治理,高等教育自治,资金,高等教育法律和决策结构方面的各种改革。本文认为,如果政府限制其对高等教育管理的影响,并且赋予高等教育机构相当大的自主权来决定学术课程的发展和关键职位的任命,那么它将使高等教育领导者能够利用其专业知识来发展高质量的高等教育。但是,值得一提的是,本文并未论证政府在高等教育治理和管理方面的缺席;政府将继续制定高等教育政策。之所以采用比较研究,是因为中国的高等教育吸引了许多来自非洲和亚洲发展中国家的学生,而加纳是一个非洲国家,有超过一万名学生在各个层次上学习课程。在过去的十年中,加纳的高等院校与中国院校建立了良好的学术关系。加纳作为寻求建立高质量高等教育的中等收入国家,可以向中国学习。这项研究还将有助于教育治理方面的文献研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号