首页> 外文期刊>Research Ethics >Expert perspectives on ethics review of international data-intensive research: Working towards mutual recognition:
【24h】

Expert perspectives on ethics review of international data-intensive research: Working towards mutual recognition:

机译:国际数据密集型研究的伦理审查专家观点:努力实现相互认可:

获取原文
           

摘要

Life sciences research is increasingly international and data-intensive. Researchers work in multi-jurisdictional teams or formally established research consortia to exchange data and conduct research using computation of multiple sources and volumes of data at multiple sites and through multiple pathways. Despite the internationalization and data intensification of research, the same ethics review process as applies to single-site studies in one country tends to apply to multi-site studies in multiple countries. Because of the standard requirement for multi-jurisdictional or multi-site ethics review, international research projects are subjected to multiple ethics reviews of the same research protocol. Consequently, the reviews may be redundant and resource-consuming, whilst the opinions delivered by ethics committees may be inconsistent both within and across jurisdictions. In this article, we present findings based on interviews conducted with international experts in research ethics on the topic of et...
机译:生命科学研究日益国际化,数据密集。研究人员在多个辖区的团队中工作,或在正式成立的研究联盟中进行工作,以交换数据并使用在多个站点和通过多种途径计算多个源和大量数据来进行研究。尽管研究已经国际化和数据密集化,但与在一个国家中用于单站点研究的道德审查过程相同,往往会在多个国家中应用于多站点研究。由于对多辖区或多场所道德审查的标准要求,国际研究项目要接受同一研究协议的多个道德审查。因此,审查可能是多余的,而且会消耗大量资源,而道德委员会所发表的意见可能在辖区内或辖区内不一致。在本文中,我们基于与国际研究伦理学专家就访谈主题进行的访谈,介绍研究结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号