首页> 外文期刊>Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics >Accuracy Assessment in Determining the Location of Corners of Building Structures Using a Combination of Various Measurement Methods
【24h】

Accuracy Assessment in Determining the Location of Corners of Building Structures Using a Combination of Various Measurement Methods

机译:结合各种测量方法确定建筑结构拐角位置的精度评估

获取原文
           

摘要

When surveys of corners of building structures are carried out, surveyors frequently use a compilation of two surveying methods. The first one involves the determination of several corners with reference to a geodetic control using classical methods of surveying field details. The second method relates to the remaining corner points of a structure, which are determined in sequence from distance-distance intersection, using control linear values of the wall faces of the building, the so-called tie distances. This paper assesses the accuracy of coordinates of corner points of a building structure, determined using the method of distance-distance intersection, based on the corners which had previously been determined by the conducted surveys tied to a geodetic control. It should be noted, however, that such a method of surveying the corners of building structures from linear measures is based on the details of the first-order accuracy, while the regulations explicitly allow such measurement only for the details of the second- and third-order accuracy. Therefore, a question arises whether this legal provision is unfounded, or whether surveyors are acting not only against the applicable standards but also without due diligence while performing surveys? This study provides answers to the formulated problem. The main purpose of the study was to verify whether the actual method which is used in practice for surveying building structures allows to obtain the required accuracy of coordinates of the points being determined, or whether it should be strictly forbidden. The results of the conducted studies clearly demonstrate that the problem is definitely more complex. Eventually, however, it might be assumed that assessment of the accuracy in determining a location of corners of a building using a combination of two different surveying methods will meet the requirements of the regulation [MIA, 2011), subject to compliance with relevant baseline criteria, which have been presented in this study. Observance of the proposed boundary conditions would allow for frequent performance of surveys of building structures by surveyors (from tie distances), while maintaining the applicable accuracy criteria. This would allow for the inclusion of surveying documentation into the national geodetic and cartographic documentation center database pursuant to the legal bases.
机译:在对建筑结构的角落进行测量时,测量师经常使用两种测量方法的汇总。第一个涉及使用大地测量的经典方法,参考大地测量确定几个角。第二种方法涉及建筑物的其余角点,这些角点是使用建筑物墙面的控制线性值(即所谓的平头距离)从距离-距离交点顺序确定的。本文基于以前由大地测量控制进行的勘测确定的拐角,评估了使用距离-距离相交的方法确定的建筑结构拐角点的坐标的准确性。但是,应该指出的是,这种从线性测量中测量建筑结构拐角的方法是基于一阶精度的细节,而法规明确允许仅针对二阶和三阶细节进行此类测量。顺序精度。因此,会出现一个问题,即该法律规定是否成立,或者验船师在进行调查时是否不仅违反适用​​标准,而且还没有尽职调查?这项研究为提出的问题提供了答案。该研究的主要目的是验证在实践中用于测量建筑结构的实际方法是否允许获得所需的确定点坐标精度,或者是否应严格禁止使用。进行的研究结果清楚地表明,这个问题肯定更加复杂。但是,最终可以假定,使用两种不同的测量方法的组合来确定建筑物拐角位置的准确性的评估将符合法规的要求[MIA,2011年] ,已在本研究中提出。遵守拟议的边界条件将允许测量师对建筑结构进行频繁的测量(根据连接距离),同时保持适用的准确性标准。这将允许根据法律依据将调查文件纳入国家大地测量和制图文件中心数据库。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号