首页> 外文OA文献 >Accuracy Assessment in Determining the Location of Corners of Building Structures Using a Combination of Various Measurement Methods
【2h】

Accuracy Assessment in Determining the Location of Corners of Building Structures Using a Combination of Various Measurement Methods

机译:使用各种测量方法的组合确定建筑物结构角落的准确性评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

When surveys of corners of building structures are carried out, surveyors frequently use a compilation of two surveying methods. The first one involves the determination of several corners with reference to a geodetic control using classical methods of surveying field details. The second method relates to the remaining corner points of a structure, which are determined in sequence from distance-distance intersection, using control linear values of the wall faces of the building, the so-called tie distances. This paper assesses the accuracy of coordinates of corner points of a building structure, determined using the method of distance-distance intersection, based on the corners which had previously been determined by the conducted surveys tied to a geodetic control. It should be noted, however, that such a method of surveying the corners of building structures from linear measures is based on the details of the first-order accuracy, while the regulations explicitly allow such measurement only for the details of the second- and third-order accuracy. Therefore, a question arises whether this legal provision is unfounded, or whether surveyors are acting not only against the applicable standards but also without due diligence while performing surveys? This study provides answers to the formulated problem. The main purpose of the study was to verify whether the actual method which is used in practice for surveying building structures allows to obtain the required accuracy of coordinates of the points being determined, or whether it should be strictly forbidden. The results of the conducted studies clearly demonstrate that the problem is definitely more complex. Eventually, however, it might be assumed that assessment of the accuracy in determining a location of corners of a building using a combination of two different surveying methods will meet the requirements of the regulation [MIA, 2011), subject to compliance with relevant baseline criteria, which have been presented in this study. Observance of the proposed boundary conditions would allow for frequent performance of surveys of building structures by surveyors (from tie distances), while maintaining the applicable accuracy criteria. This would allow for the inclusion of surveying documentation into the national geodetic and cartographic documentation center database pursuant to the legal bases.
机译:当进行建筑结构的角落调查时,测量师经常使用两种测量方法的编辑。第一个涉及使用经典测量场细节的经典方法的大地测量控制来确定几个角落。第二种方法涉及一种结构的剩余角点,其依次由距离 - 距离交叉点确定,使用建筑物的壁面的控制线性值,所谓的连接距离。本文评估了建筑结构的角点的坐标的精度,基于先前由与大地测量控制的传导调查确定的拐角来确定的距离距离交叉的方法。然而,应该注意的是,这种测量建筑结构的角落的方法是基于一阶精度的细节,而法规明确允许为第二和第三的细节进行这种测量 - 准确性。因此,一个问题出现了这种法律规定是否毫无根据,或者测量师是否不仅根据适用的标准而行动,而且在执行调查时也没有尽职调查?本研究为制定问题提供了答案。该研究的主要目的是验证用于测量建筑结构的实践中使用的实际方法是否允许获得所确定的点的坐标所需的准确性,或者是否应该严格禁止。进行的研究结果清楚地表明问题绝对更复杂。然而,最终可能假设使用两种不同的测量方法的组合确定建筑物的角落的角落的准确性的评估将符合符合相关基线标准的监管[MIA,2011)的要求,这是本研究的。遵守所提出的边界条件将允许验船师(来自系距)的建筑结构调查,同时保持适用的准确性标准。这将允许将根据法律基础进行调查文件进入国家大地码和制图文档中心数据库。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号