...
首页> 外文期刊>NeuroImage: Clinical >Poor supplementary motor area activation differentiates auditory verbal hallucination from imagining the hallucination
【24h】

Poor supplementary motor area activation differentiates auditory verbal hallucination from imagining the hallucination

机译:辅助运动区激活不佳使听觉幻觉与想象幻觉区分开来

获取原文
           

摘要

Neuronal underpinnings of auditory verbal hallucination remain poorly understood. One suggested mechanism is brain activation that is similar to verbal imagery but occurs without the proper activation of the neuronal systems that are required to tag the origins of verbal imagery in one's mind. Such neuronal systems involve the supplementary motor area. The supplementary motor area has been associated with awareness of intention to make a hand movement, but whether this region is related to the sense of ownership of one's verbal thought remains poorly known. We hypothesized that the supplementary motor area is related to the distinction between one's own mental processing (auditory verbal imagery) and similar processing that is attributed to non-self author (auditory verbal hallucination). To test this hypothesis, we asked patients to signal the onset and offset of their auditory verbal hallucinations during functional magnetic resonance imaging. During non-hallucination periods, we asked the same patients to imagine the hallucination they had previously experienced. In addition, healthy control subjects signaled the onset and offset of self-paced imagery of similar voices. Both hallucinations and the imagery of hallucinations were associated with similar activation strengths of the fronto-temporal language-related circuitries, but the supplementary motor area was activated more strongly during the imagery than during hallucination. These findings suggest that auditory verbal hallucination resembles verbal imagery in language processing, but without the involvement of the supplementary motor area, which may subserve the sense of ownership of one's own verbal imagery. Highlights ? We compared involuntary (hallucinations) and voluntary (imagery) verbal processing. ? First such study in patients. ? Supplementary motor area (SMA) activation differed between conditions. ? Language-related circuitries were similarly activated during both conditions. ? Convergent evidence from intra-subject and between-groups analyses. ? SMA may be involved in the experience of the ownership of one's verbal thought.
机译:听觉幻觉的神经元基础仍然知之甚少。一种建议的机制是大脑激活,类似于言语意象,但发生时没有适当的激活人脑中标记言语意象起源所需的神经系统的激活。这样的神经系统涉及辅助运动区域。辅助运动领域已经与人们意向进行手部运动的意识相关联,但是,该区域是否与一个人的口头思想的主人翁意识有关却鲜为人知。我们假设辅助运动区域与自己的心理处理(听觉言语意象)与归因于非本人作者的类似处理(听觉言语幻觉)有关。为了验证这一假设,我们要求患者在功能磁共振成像过程中发出听觉言语幻觉的发作和偏移信号。在非晕厥期间,我们让相同的患者想象他们以前经历的幻觉。此外,健康的对照对象还发出了类似声音的自定进度图像的发作和偏移信号。幻觉和幻觉图像都具有与额颞语言相关电路类似的激活强度,但是在成像过程中,比幻觉过程中更强烈地激活了辅助运动区域。这些发现表明,听觉言语幻觉类似于语言处理中的言语意象,但没有辅助运动区域的参与,这可能会保留一个人自己的言语意象的归属感。强调 ?我们比较了非自愿(晕动)和自愿(影像)口头处理。 ?首先在患者中进行此类研究。 ?在不同情况下,辅助运动区域(SMA)的激活有所不同。 ?在这两种情况下,与语言相关的电路均被类似地激活。 ?来自受试者内部和群体间分析的融合证据。 ? SMA可能会参与一个人的口头思想所有权的体验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号