...
首页> 外文期刊>mSystems >16S rRNA/rRNA Gene Ratios and Cell Activity Staining Reveal Consistent Patterns of Microbial Activity in Plant-Associated Soil
【24h】

16S rRNA/rRNA Gene Ratios and Cell Activity Staining Reveal Consistent Patterns of Microbial Activity in Plant-Associated Soil

机译:植物相关土壤中16S rRNA / rRNA基因比率和细胞活性染色揭示了微生物活性的一致模式

获取原文
           

摘要

At any given time, only a subset of microbial community members are active in their environment. The others are in a state of dormancy, with strongly reduced metabolic rates. It is of interest to distinguish active and inactive microbial cells and taxa to understand their functional contributions to ecosystem processes and to understand shifts in microbial activity in response to change. Of the methods used to assess microbial activity-dormancy dynamics, 16S rRNA/rRNA gene amplicons (16S ratios) and active cell staining with 5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride (CTC) are two of the most common, yet each method has limitations. Given that in situ activity-dormancy dynamics are proxied only by laboratory methods, further study is needed to assess the level of agreement and potential complementarity of these methods. We conducted two experiments investigating microbial activity in plant-associated soils. First, we treated corn field soil with phytohormones to simulate plant soil stress signaling, and second, we used rhizosphere soil from common bean plants exposed to drought or nutrient enrichment. Overall, the 16S ratio and CTC methods exhibited similar patterns of relative activity across treatments when treatment effects were large, and the instances in which they differed could be attributed to changes in community size (e.g., cell death or growth). Therefore, regardless of the method used to assess activity, we recommend quantifying community size to inform ecological interpretation. Our results suggest that the 16S ratio and CTC methods report comparable patterns of activity that can be applied to observe ecological dynamics over time, space, or experimental treatment. IMPORTANCE Although the majority of microorganisms in natural ecosystems are dormant, relatively little is known about the dynamics of the active and dormant microbial pools through both space and time. The limited knowledge of microbial activity-dormancy dynamics is in part due to uncertainty in the methods currently used to quantify active taxa. Here, we directly compared two of the most common methods (16S ratios and active cell staining) for estimating microbial activity in plant-associated soil and found that they were largely in agreement in the overarching patterns. Our results suggest that 16S ratios and active cell staining provide complementary information for measuring and interpreting microbial activity-dormancy dynamics in soils. They also support the idea that 16S rRNA/rRNA gene ratios have comparative value and offer a high-throughput, sequencing-based option for understanding relative changes in microbiome activity, as long as this method is coupled with quantification of community size.
机译:在任何给定时间,只有一部分微生物群落成员在其环境中活跃。其他的则处于休眠状态,代谢率大大降低。区分活跃和不活跃的微生物细胞和分类单元,以了解它们对生态系统过程的功能贡献,以及了解微生物活动响应变化而引起的变化,是很有意义的。在评估微生物活性-休眠动态的方法中,最常见的两种是16S rRNA / rRNA基因扩增子(16S比率)和用5-氰基-2,3-二甲苯基四唑氯化物(CTC)进行的活性细胞染色。方法有局限性。鉴于原位活动-休眠动态仅通过实验室方法进行代理,因此需要进一步研究以评估这些方法的一致性和潜在的互补性。我们进行了两个研究植物相关土壤中微生物活性的实验。首先,我们用植物激素处理了玉米田土壤,以模拟植物土壤的胁迫信号,其次,我们使用了暴露于干旱或营养富集的普通豆类植物的根际土壤。总体而言,当治疗效果大时,16S比值和CTC方法在各治疗方案之间表现出相似的相对活性模式,并且它们差异的情况可能归因于群落大小的变化(例如,细胞死亡或生长)。因此,无论采用哪种方法评估活动,我们都建议量化社区规模以提供生态学解释。我们的结果表明16S比值和CTC方法报告了可比较的活动模式,可用于观察时间,空间或实验处理中的生态动态。重要信息尽管自然生态系统中的大多数微生物都处于休眠状态,但对于活动微生物和休眠微生物库在空间和时间上的动态知之甚少。对微生物活动休眠动态的了解有限,部分原因是目前用于量化活动类群的方法的不确定性。在这里,我们直接比较了两种最常见的估算植物相关土壤中微生物活性的方法(16S比和活性细胞染色),发现它们在总体模式上基本一致。我们的结果表明16S比率和活性细胞染色为测量和解释土壤中微生物活性-休眠动态提供了补充信息。他们还支持以下观点:16S rRNA / rRNA基因比率具有比较价值,并提供高通量,基于测序的选项,以了解微生物组活性的相对变化,只要该方法与社区规模的量化相结合即可。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号