...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical science monitor : >Do patients with active RA have differences in disease activity and perceptions if anti-TNF na?ve versus anti-TNF experienced? Baseline results of the optimization of adalimumab trial
【24h】

Do patients with active RA have differences in disease activity and perceptions if anti-TNF na?ve versus anti-TNF experienced? Baseline results of the optimization of adalimumab trial

机译:如果经历过抗TNF天真的抗TNF患者,活动性RA患者在疾病活动和知觉方面是否有差异?阿达木单抗试验优化的基线结果

获取原文

摘要

Background:The chance of a good response in RA is attenuated in previous anti-TNF users who start new anti-TNF therapy compared to biologic na?ve patients. In active RA, those with previous anti-TNF exposure compared to anti-TNF na?ve may have different baseline disease activity and patient perceptions when starting a new anti-TNF treatment that could explain the observed response differences.Material/Methods:The aim of this study was a post hoc analysis of baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the Optimization of Adalimumab study that was a treat to target vs. routine care study in patients initiating adalimumab. As per the protocol, a maximum of 20% anti-TNF experienced patients were enrolled in the 300 patient trial. Twelve (4.0%) were excluded who previously used other biologics. Baseline characteristics including age, gender, tender and swollen joint counts, disease activity (DAS28), function (HAQ-DI), patient global assessment, patient satisfaction with current treatment, and inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR), were compared between previously anti-TNF experienced [etanercept or infliximab (EXP)], and anti-TNF na?ve patients (NA?VE).Results:The mean (SD) age was 54.8 (13.3) years; 81.0% were female, and 237 (79.0%) were anti-TNF na?ve while 51 (17.0%) patients were anti-TNF experienced (29 with etanercept, 16 with infliximab, and 6 for both). The mean (SD) baseline in EXP versus NA?VE groups respectively was: CRP=21.7(32.9) vs. 17.5(20.7); ESR=28.7(22.5) vs. 29.8(20.4); SJC=10.5(6.0) vs. 10.7(5.6); TJC=12.8(7.1) vs. 12.3(7.3); and DAS28=6.0(1.2) vs. 5.8(1.1). None of the between-group differences were statistically significant, however, the HAQ-DI in EXP was 1.7(0.6) compared to 1.5(0.7) for the NA?VE (P=0.021). Additionally, EXP patients had a higher patient global score [71.3(26.1) vs. 61.9(26.2), P=0.021].Conclusions:Although anti-TNF na?ve and experienced patients who initiated adalimumab were similar, with respect to several baseline characteristics, significant differences in subjective measures were observed, which may indicate more severe patient measures (function and global disease activity) in anti-TNF experienced patients.
机译:背景:与单纯生物治疗的患者相比,以前开始使用新的抗TNF治疗的抗TNF使用者减少了RA良好反应的机会。在活动性RA中,与先前使用过抗TNF的抗TNF接触者相比,在开始新的抗TNF治疗时可能具有不同的基线疾病活性和患者认知,这可以解释观察到的反应差异。这项研究的目的是对加入阿达木单抗优化研究的患者的基线特征进行事后分析,该研究是针对开始阿达木单抗的患者进行靶向治疗与常规治疗研究的一种疗法。按照方案,在300名患者试验中,最多接受20%抗TNF经验的患者。排除了十二位(4.0%)以前使用过其他生物制剂的人。比较了以前的抗抑郁药的基线特征,包括年龄,性别,嫩弱和肿胀的关节计数,疾病活动性(DAS28),功能(HAQ-DI),患者总体评估,患者对当前治疗的满意度以及炎性标志物(CRP,ESR) -TNF经历过[依那西普或英夫利昔单抗(EXP)]和抗TNF初治患者(NA?VE)。结果:平均(SD)年龄为54.8(13.3)岁;女性为81.0%,未接受过抗TNF治疗的患者为237(79.0%),而接受过抗TNF治疗的患者为51(17.0%)(依那西普为29例,英夫利昔单抗为16,两者均为6)。 EXP组和NA?VE组的平均(SD)基准分别为:CRP = 21.7(32.9)对17.5(20.7); ESR = 28.7(22.5)和29.8(20.4); SJC = 10.5(6.0)和10.7(5.6); TJC = 12.8(7.1)与12.3(7.3); DAS28 = 6.0(1.2)和5.8(1.1)。组间差异均无统计学意义,但是EXP中的HAQ-DI为1.7(0.6),而NAΔVE为1.5(0.7)(P = 0.021)。此外,EXP患者的整体评分较高[71.3(26.1)vs. 61.9(26.2),P = 0.021]。结论:虽然抗TNF初治和有经验的患者开始使用阿达木单抗在几个基线上相似的特征,观察到主观措施之间的显着差异,这可能表明在有抗TNF经验的患者中采取了更严格的患者措施(功能和总体疾病活动)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号