首页> 外文期刊>Medical Education Online >Medical students as human subjects in educational research
【24h】

Medical students as human subjects in educational research

机译:医学生作为教育研究中的人类学科

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction : Special concerns often arise when medical students are themselves the subjects of education research. A recently completed large, multi-center randomized controlled trial of computer-assisted learning modules for surgical clerks provided the opportunity to explore the perceived level of risk of studies where medical students serve as human subjects by reporting on: 1) the response of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at seven institutions to the same study protocol; and 2) the thoughts and feelings of students across study sites about being research subjects. Methods : From July 2009 to August 2010, all third-year medical students at seven collaborating institutions were eligible to participate. Patterns of IRB review of the same protocol were compared. Participation burden was calculated in terms of the time spent interacting with the modules. Focus groups were conducted with medical students at each site. Transcripts were coded by three independent reviewers and analyzed using Atlas.ti. Results : The IRBs at the seven participating institutions granted full (n=1), expedited (n=4), or exempt (n=2) review of the WISE Trial protocol. 995 (73% of those eligible) consented to participate, and 207 (20%) of these students completed all outcome measures. The average time to complete the computer modules and associated measures was 175 min. Common themes in focus groups with participant students included the desire to contribute to medical education research, the absence of coercion to consent, and the low-risk nature of the research. Discussion : Our findings demonstrate that risk assessment and the extent of review utilized for medical education research vary among IRBs. Despite variability in the perception of risk implied by differing IRB requirements, students themselves felt education research was low risk and did not consider themselves to be vulnerable. The vast majority of eligible medical students were willing to participate as research subjects. Participants acknowledged the time demands of their participation and were readily able to withdraw when those burdens became unsustainable.
机译:简介:当医学生本身就是教育研究的对象时,通常会引起特别的关注。最近完成的大型多中心外科文员计算机辅助学习模块随机对照试验,通过以下方面的报道,探索了医学生作为人类受试者的研究风险的感知水平:1)机构审查的反应七个研究机构的委员会(IRB)遵循相同的研究方案; 2)跨研究站点的学生对成为研究主题的想法和感受。方法:从2009年7月到2010年8月,来自七个合作机构的所有三年级医学生都有资格参加。比较了相同协议的IRB审查模式。参与负担是根据与模块交互所花费的时间计算的。在每个地点与医学生进行了焦点小组讨论。抄本由三位独立审稿人编码,并使用Atlas.ti分析。 结果:七个参与机构的IRB对WISE试用协议进行了完整(n = 1),加急(n = 4)或豁免(n = 2)审查。 995名(占合格学生的73%)表示同意参加,其中207名(占20%)学生完成了所有结果指标。完成计算机模块和相关措施的平均时间为175分钟。与参加研究的学生组成的焦点小组的共同主题包括希望为医学教育研究做出贡献的愿望,缺乏强制同意的意愿以及研究的低风险性质。 讨论:我们的发现表明,IRB之间的风险评估和医学教育研究的审查程度不同。尽管IRB要求不同,对风险的理解也存在差异,但学生们自己还是认为教育研究的风险很低,并不认为自己是脆弱的。绝大多数合格的医学生愿意参加研究。与会者承认参加会议的时间要求,并在这些负担变得无法承受时很容易撤回。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号