...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Visual Choice Reaction Time
【24h】

The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Visual Choice Reaction Time

机译:反复测试,模拟的病残和脑外伤对视觉选择反应时间的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Choice reaction time (CRT), the time required to discriminate and respond appropriately to different stimuli, is a basic measure of attention and processing speed. Here, we describe the reliability and clinical sensitivity of a new CRT test that presents lateralized visual stimuli and adaptively adjusts stimulus onset asynchronies using a staircase procedure. Experiment 1 investigated the test–retest reliability in three test sessions performed at weekly intervals. Performance in the first test session was accurately predicted from age and computer-use regression functions obtained in a previously studied normative cohort. Central processing time (CentPT), the difference between the CRTs and simple reaction time latencies measured in a separate experiment, accounted for 55% of CRT latency and more than 85% of CRT latency variance. Performance improved significantly across the three test sessions. High intraclass correlation coefficients were seen for CRTs (0.90), CentPTs (0.87), and an omnibus performance measure (0.81) that combined CRT and minimal SOA z -scores. Experiment 2 investigated performance in the same participants when instructed to feign symptoms of traumatic brain injury (TBI): 87% produced abnormal omnibus z -scores. Simulated malingerers showed greater elevations in simple reaction times than CRTs, and hence reduced CentPTs. Latency-consistency z -scores, based on the difference between the CRTs obtained and those predicted based on CentPT latencies, discriminated malingering participants from controls with high sensitivity and specificity. Experiment 3 investigated CRT test performance in military veterans who had suffered combat-related TBI and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, and revealed small but significant deficits in performance in the TBI population. The results indicate that the new CRT test shows high test–retest reliability, can assist in detecting participants performing with suboptimal effort, and is sensitive to the effects of TBI on the speed and accuracy of visual processing.
机译:选择反应时间(CRT)是区分和对不同刺激做出适当反应所需的时间,是注意力和处理速度的基本量度。在这里,我们描述了一种新的CRT测试的可靠性和临床敏感性,该测试可呈现侧向视觉刺激并使用阶梯程序自适应地调整刺激发作的异步性。实验1在每周进行的三个测试中研究了重测信度。根据年龄和先前研究的标准化队列中获得的计算机使用回归函数,可以准确地预测第一次测试的性能。中央处理时间(CentPT),CRT与简单反应时间延迟之间的差异(在单独的实验中测得)占CRT延迟的55%,超过CRT延迟的85%。在三个测试阶段中,性能得到了显着改善。对于CRT(0.90),CentPT(0.87)和综合了CRT和最小SOA z得分的综合性能指标(0.81),看到了较高的类内相关系数。实验2在指示假性颅脑损伤(TBI)的假症状时调查了同一参与者的表现:87%的人产生了异常的综合z评分。模拟的犯罪分子比CRT显示出更高的简单反应时间升高,从而降低了CentPTs。延迟一致性z得分基于获得的CRT与基于CentPT潜伏期预测的CRT之间的差异,区分了恶意制造者与高灵敏度和特异性对照。实验3调查了在经历了与战斗有关的TBI和创伤后应激障碍症状的退伍军人中进行CRT测试的表现,并揭示了TBI人群的表现存在微小但明显的缺陷。结果表明,新的CRT测试显示出较高的重测可靠性,可以帮助检测参与者的最佳表现,并且对TBI对视觉处理的速度和准确性的影响敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号