首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >The Effects of Repeat Testing, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Computerized Measures of Visuospatial Memory Span
【24h】

The Effects of Repeat Testing, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Computerized Measures of Visuospatial Memory Span

机译:重复测试,致病和外伤性脑损伤对视觉空间记忆跨度计算机化测量的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Spatial span tests (SSTs) such as the Corsi Block Test (CBT) and the SST of the Wechsler Memory Scale are widely used to assess deficits in spatial working memory. We conducted three experiments to evaluate the test–retest reliability and clinical sensitivity of a new computerized spatial span test (C-SST) that incorporates psychophysical methods to improve the precision of spatial span measurement. In Experiment 1, we analyzed C-SST test–retest reliability in 49 participants who underwent three test sessions at weekly intervals. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were higher for a psychophysically derived mean span (MnS) metric (0.83) than for the maximal span and total correct metrics used in traditional spatial-span tests. Response times (ReTs) also showed high ICCs (0.93) that correlated negatively with MnS scores and correlated positively with response-time latencies from other tests of processing speed. Learning effects were insignificant. Experiment 2 examined the performance of Experiment 1 participants when instructed to feign symptoms of traumatic brain injury (TBI): 57% showed abnormal MnS z-scores. A MnS z-score cutoff of 3.0 correctly classified 36% of simulated malingerers and 91% of the subgroup of 11 control participants with abnormal spans. Malingerers also made more substitution errors than control participants with abnormal spans (sensitivity = 43%, specificity = 91%). In addition, malingerers showed no evidence of ReT slowing, in contrast to significant abnormalities seen on other malingered tests of processing speed. As a result, differences between ReT z-scores and z-scores on other processing speed tests showed very high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing malingering and control participants with either normal or abnormal spans. Experiment 3 examined C-SST performance in a group of patients with predominantly mild TBI: neither MnS nor ReT z-scores showed significant group-level abnormalities. The C-SST improves the reliability and sensitivity of spatial span testing, can accurately detect malingering, and shows that visuospatial working memory is largely preserved in patients with predominantly mild TBI.
机译:空间跨度测试(SST),例如Corsi Block Test(CBT)和Wechsler Memory Scale的SST,被广泛用于评估空间工作记忆的不足。我们进行了三个实验,以评估一种新的计算机化空间跨度测试(C-SST)的重测信度和临床敏感性,该测试结合了心理物理方法来提高空间跨度测量的准确性。在实验1中,我们分析了49位参与者的C-SST重测信度,他们每星期进行3次测试。从心理学上推导的平均跨度(MnS)指标(0.83),类内相关系数(ICC)高于传统空间跨度测试中使用的最大跨度和总正确指标。响应时间(ReTs)还显示出较高的ICC(0.93),与MnS分数呈负相关,与其他处理速度测试的响应时间延迟呈正相关。学习效果微不足道。实验2在指示假冒外伤性脑损伤(TBI)的症状时检查了实验1参与者的表现:57%的患者表现出异常的MnS z评分。 MnS z分数为3.0时,正确区分了36%的模拟病假人和91%跨度异常的11名对照组参与者的亚组。 Malingerers的替代错误也比跨度异常的对照参与者多(敏感性= 43%,特异性= 91%)。此外,恶意程序没有显示ReT减慢的迹象,这与其他恶意程序处理速度测试中看到的明显异常形成鲜明对比。结果,ReT z得分与其他处理速度测试的z得分之间的差异显示出在区分正常或异常跨度的假冒和控制参与者方面非常高的敏感性和特异性。实验3在一组轻度TBI患者中检查了C-SST表现:MnS和ReT z评分均未显示明显的组水平异常。 C-SST提高了空间跨度测试的可靠性和灵敏性,可以准确地检测出恶意行为,并且表明在以轻度TBI为主的患者中,视觉空间工作记忆得到了很大的保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号