首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Does the Relation between Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Depend on Age or on Reading Level? A Behavioral and ERP Study
【24h】

Does the Relation between Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Depend on Age or on Reading Level? A Behavioral and ERP Study

机译:快速自动命名和阅读之间的关系是否取决于年龄或阅读水平?行为与ERP研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Reading predictors evolve through age: phonological awareness is the best predictor of reading abilities at the beginning of reading acquisition while Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) becomes the best reading predictor in more experienced readers (around 9–10 years old). Those developmental changes in the relationship between RAN and reading have so far been explained in term of participants' age. However, it should be noted that in the previous experiments age always co-vary with participants reading level. It is thus not clear whether RAN-reading relationship is developmental in nature or related to the reading system itself. This study investigates whether the behavioral changes in the relationship between RAN and reading and their electrophysiological correlates are related to the chronological age or to the reading level of the participants. Thirty two French-speaking children aged 7–10 years took part to the experiment: they were divided into groups contrasted on age but with similar reading levels and the other way round. Participants performed two reading tasks and four RAN tasks. EEG/ERP was recorded during discrete letter and picture RAN. Behavioral results revealed that alphanumeric RAN is more sensitive to age variations than reading level differences. The inverse profile was revealed for picture RAN, which discriminate poor and good readers among typically developed children within the same age-group. ERPs of both letter and picture RAN differed across age groups whereas only for the picture RAN ERPs differed across reading levels. Taken together, these results suggest that picture RAN is a particularly good indicator of reading level variance independently of age.
机译:阅读预测因素会随着年龄的增长而变化:语音意识是阅读获取开始时阅读能力的最佳预测因素,而快速自动命名(RAN)在经验更丰富的读者(大约9至10岁)中成为最佳阅读预测因素。到目前为止,已经根据参与者的年龄来解释RAN和阅读之间的关系的那些发展变化。但是,应注意,在以前的实验中,年龄总是与参与者的阅读水平有关。因此,尚不清楚RA​​N-阅读关系本质上是发展性的还是与阅读系统本身有关。这项研究调查RAN和阅读之间的关系的行为变化及其电生理相关性是否与年龄,参与者的阅读水平有关。 32名7至10岁的说法语的孩子参加了该实验:将他们分成年龄不同但阅读水平相近的组,反之则相反。参与者执行了两个阅读任务和四个RAN任务。在离散字母和图片RAN期间记录了EEG / ERP。行为结果表明,字母数字RAN比阅读水平差异对年龄变化更敏感。图像RAN显示了相反的情况,它可以区分同一年龄组中典型的发育不良儿童中的好读者和好读者。字母RAN和图片RAN的ERP随年龄段而有所不同,而仅图片RAN的ERP随阅读水平而不同。两者合计,这些结果表明图片RAN是独立于年龄的阅读水平差异的特别好的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号