首页> 外文期刊>Mathematics Education Trends and Research >Formative Evaluation as Efficient Strategy for Learning Mathematics
【24h】

Formative Evaluation as Efficient Strategy for Learning Mathematics

机译:形成性评估是学习数学的有效策略

获取原文
       

摘要

Evaluation always was problem for teachers and or instructors in present educational systems. Teacher yet did not know whether formative evaluation is proper or summative formative. Obviously formative evaluation has efficiency than summative evaluation. In this study, quasi-experimental method is used and via simple sampling method, formative evaluation is applied in two forms such as multiple- choice evaluation and essay formative evaluation among girl students of Shahrekord at first grade of high school. 67 girl students are chosen as three separate groups; group 1, 2, 3 that group 1 and 2 are applied multiple- choice evaluation and essay evaluation as the formative forms versus group 3 who is used of summative evaluation only. The results of ANOVA and Scheffe tests have indicated that there are differences among three groups which are considered as multiple-choice evaluation, essay formative evaluation and summative evaluation respectively. Finally it is showed that multiple-choice evaluation has not significant difference versus summative evaluation. Therefore essay formative is the best the kind of formative evaluation.
机译:在当前的教育系统中,评估一直是教师和/或讲师的难题。老师还不知道形成性评价是适当的还是总结性形成性的。显然,形成性评价比总结性评价更有效率。在这项研究中,使用准实验方法,通过简单的抽样方法,对Shahrekord初中一年级女生的选择评价和论文形成评价以两种形式进行形成评价。 67名女学生被选为三个独立的小组;在第1、2、3组中,将第1和第2组应用多项选择评估和作文评估作为形成形式,而第3组仅使用总结评估。 ANOVA和Scheffe检验的结果表明,三组之间存在差异,分别被认为是多项选择评估,论文形成性评估和总结性评估。最后表明,多项选择评价与总结评价没有显着差异。因此,论文形成性是最好的一种形成性评价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号